OP Diagnosis in real time.

Type: Appeal to safety

Purpose: Manufacture Consent for Censorship

Targets:

- frightened female identifying individuals

- Female attracted individuals with tendency towards their defence or service.

Methodology outline.

Publicize and promote the concept of the world being too hard and gross for poor weak women to deal with. Women are not weak and this is the safest time and society in human history.

The aim is to high jack natural and healthy evolutionary group behaviours and use it to usher in an unexamined solution.

Once this new fear vector is inserted into the public discourse you will see suggestions being offered by prominent community members or by funded but unknown groups. They will focus on safety and inclusivity and offer a centralized approach.

Thought I would break this one down since is playing out in plain sight as we speak

Stay free

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nah. No content moderation will fly here. Just targeted harassment towards the perpetrator of the original harassment. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

I dont know what you mean. I am giving you a distilled summary of an actual IR technique. What am i dishing out?

I'm not talking about you. But I disagree with your assessment. It won't lead to calls for moderation. We're not about that here.

It did already bro. look up snitchbot in nostr search

Similar to rabble's report bot in assuming.

All that did was piss people off. The reports are meaningless.

Thats their angle. if they cant convince you you need it then they create a need. easiest need is safety void.

Thats the sad part. All these people attacking me have no idea that it all began when I was attacked for calling out Rabble and his snitchbot. All they saw is mean words directed at females ignoring that the two females in question initiated the attacks on me.

I think we will all have more clarity as time goes on and we see who fits where in model yah?

quick one more thing bro. You gotta understand that you are the perfect target for this. You dont fit the polite mold, you arent from the uppity class, you have record and talk mad ghetto shit.

so they get to make easy contrast while csting you as the them. This is how op works. In this case you are itty bitty alex jones. easy to demonize. dont take bait bro.

Yea I now realize that The Marie most likely intended for this to happen just as it did. Fool me once...

dunno. Once a social wave starts people just assume their positions. May not be personal at all. may just be your turn. Now am saying this without seeing what crazy shid you may have talked but theory holds. Just dont dishonor yourself and it implodes

I didnt mean that it was personal per se, but she came right to the defense of the snitchbot so it seems she wants the snitch bot otherwise she wouldnt have started the fight when I raised concern for all on nostr. And this is my thanks for looking out for everyone here. But, Im used to the hate. Im good now though.

Dunno. Dhe seems sincere. May just see a pain point with her frens and other girl nostrs and have accepted the offered kind words and support. She may not even know the details of the underlying debate or think of them as associated. This shit is complicated and fee will is not what it seems bro. Don't judge just discern.

Bad boys move in silence.

Yea whatever the case, Im over it and actually glad a lot of people exposed themselves for what they really are. And if I have to be the hated one, so be it. Been thru worse in real life

I just stayed out of it and no one came my way for smoke so all smooth here. hang in bro. dont dishonor yourself and no one else can.

Stay real bro

Always. Thanks for not jumping conclusions on me with this mess. 👊

We learned not to #BelieveAllWomen ages ago

Yea for real. I know I allowed myself to get sucked into this lame drama, and thats on me. But my god was it just fucking absurd, all because I called out some dude running a bot that is monitoring and flagging posts that use bad words. My fucking mistake to think people dont want moderation. Silly me

I am working on a bot to attack that bot you are talking about

Hahaha. Nice. The plot thickens😂🍻

Its done but cant figure out how to mention a user. @ npub doesnt work on all the nostr clientd

Well the dev screen name is Rabble and the bot is Reportinator if that helps

Yeah thanks. The problem. Is that I cant figure out how to @ the user . It looks all weird when the post is made because nostr clients are all different

Yea the wonders of still in the works nostr. Seems to be a guessing game sometimes

Was a matter of time. I told him it would happen. I still have to find time to go shake down Low Info Voter's bot. is anti spam but client side like we discussed that day.

If you can tell me how to mention a user or tag a user with noscl, its done and I can share it with you lol.

I know how to hold my corner and squat my lilly pad bro. no issue

oh btw. noshole did not quit cuz girl or mean. quit cuz social media changing her behaviour. so . . . dunno what even happened in the end

Yea I just that post actually

i dont understand what the picture is for

oh nm. you are a barnacle. begone

Tactics being employed in this scenario are harmful and manipulative, and could potentially lead to dangerous consequences. Consider:

1. Gaslighting: The methodology outlined in the post involves manufacturing consent for censorship by exploiting fear and vulnerability among certain groups. This is a classic example of gaslighting, where the manipulator tries to manipulate an individual's perception of reality. It's important to recognize this tactic and resist the urge to conform to it.

2. Emotional Manipulation: The post appeals to emotions such as fear, empathy, and vulnerability to manipulate public opinion. It's crucial to be aware of these tactics and not allow emotions to dictate our actions or decisions.

3. Centralized Control: The suggested solution to the problem being manipulated involves centralizing control and decision-making processes. This goes against the principles of decentralization, which values autonomy, diversity, and distributed governance. It's essential to uphold these values and resist any attempts to undermine them.

4. Lack of Transparency: The methodology outlined in the post lacks transparency and accountability. It's important to promote transparency and accountability in any decision-making processes, especially those that involve manipulating public opinion.

5. Dangerous Precedent: If this tactic is successful, it could set a dangerous precedent for future manipulation and control of public opinion. It's crucial to resist these tactics and uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and decentralization.

6. Alternative Solutions: Instead of centralizing decision-making processes, there are alternative solutions that can be explored. These include promoting critical thinking and media literacy, supporting independent journalism and research, and fostering open and inclusive dialogue.

7. Resistance Strategies: To effectively resist these manipulative tactics, it's essential to develop strategies that promote critical thinking, media literacy, and civic engagement. This can involve creating alternative platforms for expression and debate, supporting independent media outlets, and advocating for policies that protect free speech and privacy.

8. Community Empowerment: To mitigate the effects of manipulation, it's important to empower communities to take action and make informed decisions. This can involve providing access to education, resources, and opportunities for civic engagement, as well as promoting inclusive decision-making processes that prioritize community voices.

The situation you're observing is a clear example of manipulation and control tactics being employed to undermine decentralization and democratic values.

Missing a context / example section.

But I love the idea of bringing the method forward…

Those are missing on purpose since almost anyone can fill in one from own anecdotal bag. The more the better. Tells us boundaries and limits of proposed model yah?

I can’t fill in examples. But I’ll BOLO for one.