One way to solve this may be with primary research. Having read the talk, editors are objecting to "censorship resistance" being stated in a way that it appears to be a claim that is unsubstantiated. The alternative would be to state it as e.g. "Nostr users choose Nostr because of its censorship resistance". To quickly create a survey of users for this purpose may help and is easy, give me a minute...
Wikipedia Nostr entry keeps getting edited to remove references to censorship resistance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostr
I'm starting to understand why WikiFreedia needs to be a thing.
Discussion
Ok, try this. Then we submit to Wikipedia with the wording as follows. "Nostr users prefer Nostr due to its... ". Pls boost for visibility (I'm no one, have no reach) nostr:nevent1qqs9vtu3xuz08ep488c08mjdn8xlc8le55gy4mmezsqynle0r5ccd2gpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qzl9whkrnjlfgg9q0k39r4tymu4ty3r5uy6tgxqdnd7f6xxcf8dmsxpqqqqdnjtzzkeg
The censorship resistance is marketing. People may choose it for that reason, but that doesnt make it true. The vast majority of relays in are G7 data centers. I would consider nostr to be resilient like RAID, if one hard disk fails, you can use another.