> 2️⃣ App Releases as a potentially more suited place to reference which specs your app is built on
Makes a lot of sense to me. Without that real-world context you can be forced into a kind of lowest-common-denominator-of-possibilities outlook.
> 2️⃣ App Releases as a potentially more suited place to reference which specs your app is built on
Makes a lot of sense to me. Without that real-world context you can be forced into a kind of lowest-common-denominator-of-possibilities outlook.
True story!
Will pitch the idea to nostr:npub1wf4pufsucer5va8g9p0rj5dnhvfeh6d8w0g6eayaep5dhps6rsgs43dgh9 , but it's not priority now.
Step one = Getting the communities running where we can collab on these NIPs in the first place.
For sure. If you get it up I'm happy to test sending join events with some throwaway nostr:npubs. This here web UI seems like it'd make testing pretty easy for a small test group.
We won't have join events 😉.
You'll get to just visit.
Every content type has their own publication conditions / pricing: nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp22rfmsktmgpk2rtan7zwu00zuzax5maq5dnsu5g3xxvqr2u3pd7qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcqyqzez5qxmgts9hrqfx8gydj6as2jn6rkf67x96apt75ah7wlzkwwsd4c7fy