You're saying "should be" a lot. What do you mean by that? Who are you seeking to enforce that upon and by what right can you enforce it? What if someone disagrees? Gulag?
Discussion
i said "should" once. I'm echo-ing what organized labor is demanding from those that exploit the fact that under capitalism they need to sell an increasing amount of hours of their livelihoods to the capitalists for wages to then be able to pay other capitalists for basic needs like housing, food, and healthcare. gulag?? please the u.s. imprisons the most humans out of any other state actor for not falling in line with the private property or capital order doctrines. u.s. prison labor for the u.s. corporations. diverting attention from the content of what I am saying so you don't have to confront the ideas.
You keep pointing to the State as the source of the problems (and the protector of entrenched/lobbying interests, and the imprisoner). I agree with you there.
Organized labor can demand whatever they want. And if their demand aren't met, they're free to go elsewhere (or be forced to when their employer chooses to fire them rather than cave, and hire labor who doesn't make demands they don't wish to meet). Where is the problem there? When people can't agree, they must part ways. How else could a disagreement be resolved other than violence? This is good. That's a voluntary situation you're describing.
I envy your energy... I'm done.