*sigh*
2) bio-essentialism doesn't dictate status—that's done culturally. a lot of people considered "low status" reproduce.
3) that's not an argument
5) you don't seem to understand the point i made—you're comparing something different (heterosexual couples aren't same-sex couples) (and besides, divorce rates are a distraction and not the point)
7) give - give isn't a transaction. unconditional love should be just what it means—unconditional. what happens if your partner is sick? do you stop giving? no. you give more. do you keep score? no. because it's not a transaction.
8) i can look outside and see this is false. plenty of bald, short men have partners.
9) my point still stands
10) you missed the point: having a negative attribution bias doesn't make one a nasty person. men do nasty things all around the world—should all men be called rapists, traffickers, child predators, violent criminals, war mongers, etc.?
11) again, just because men value beauty does not automatically qualify it as "high status." it consists of a lot more than beauty.
once more, you're not citing "uncomfortable truths," you're just being an a-hole.
