I'm reading Tree Crops, written in the 1950s, which goes deeply into the advantages of using trees for fruits and nuts rather than basing agriculture on annual crops. Especially on hilly land, the tilling required for crops is devastating for the soil.

It's basically all about time preference.

"When the Corsican starts a crop, he does it by planting beautiful trees whose crops he and his children and his children's children will later pick up from year to year, decade to decade, generation to generation. When the American mountaineer wants to sow a crop, he must fight for it.. first he cuts and burns forests… in a few seasons the mountainside cornfield is gullied to ruin, and the mountaineer, the raper of the mountain, must laboriously make another field.

There is one argument for corn. It is a great and destructive argument. The plant is annual. The labor of the husbandman is quickly rewarded. The ruin of his farm comes later."

#perennials

#permaculture, #permies

#homesteading

#timepreference

#soil

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's such a different viewpoint than we would see now - what I think of as true environmentalism (health of soil, land, people, animals).

Most of the trees he explores are for animal fodder (e.g. pigs eat the acorns, we eat the pigs), since he points out - rightly - that growing grain for livestock is ecologically ruinous and far less productive in the end.

Also with trees you can explore "2-story" agriculture - something grown on the ground later beneath the trees.

Of course permaculturalists will point out that we can have 7 layers in our forest gardens, but Smith is exploring tree agriculture on a larger scale - acre of chestnuts, oaks, hickories, persimmons, etc. Personally I think that focusing on scale is part of what got us into such a mess in the first place (@`jackspirko` has a great episode on the USDA "go big or go home" campaign) but rows of nut trees and productive ground layer would be a dramatic improvement on the monoculture disaster that we have now.

How well does animal agriculture scale with animals that are suited for grazing? I know there are livestock breeds that can live primarily on forage that are sufficient for a homestead, but could those be raised in numbers sufficient to sell and turn a profit?

Obviously, though, annual crops like grains have been historically quite successful in some areas of the world.

I don't know tons about the subject, but I would guess that different crops are suited to different landscapes and ecologies. A fertile river valley with rich soils might better support sustained annual cropping, while a more mountainous region would be best suited for animal husbandry and tree crops like your post describes.

Sounds like a good read.😊

An absolute wonderful book. Did you mention that it's public domain? Can be downloaded here

https://soilandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/01aglibrary/010175.tree%20crops.pdf