It seems both 40 and 96 are potential ... (though technically, the answer is 19).

I haven't seen (or figured) the explanation for 52 yet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I didn't realize that 8 isn't 4. So 52 is probably wrong. I only say probably because there's no rule stated that the first number has to be the iteration of a sequence.

96