why is it pointless? if i mute you, it's because i don't want to see your content. you can continue to create that content and post it, but i don't have to see it. both parties win.
Discussion
Yes. Thatβs how muting works. But it doesnβt explain why the lack of privacy is a good thing.
I imagine Iβm not the only one who would want the fact ive muted you to be private. I shouldnβt have to announce to the world that Iβm specifically not βlisteningβ to you.
I like the transparency.
Mutes on Amethyst are private.
My mutes on Amethyst seem to get overwritten from time to time π©
Probably by other clients that don't support private mutes.
I was trying to make people aware over a year ago but noone cared, so it's still what it was.
Try muting on amethyst and then mute someone on one of the other clients. See if the mute is still there and which one kills it. I don't know but Im suspecting the usual.
I thought I last experienced the issue with Primal, but I'm not certain.
Nostrudel and amethyst have separate lists, these two didn't mess with each other. I use these two mostly can't speak for others.
Amethyst also had a bug for a time where it wouldn't decrypt your mute list correctly with Amber, which made it seem like your list was wiped.
These lists shouldn't be separate π₯²
Yeah, I wish my muted list was used by #pokey
Agree. Can we get this implemented nostr:npub1v3tgrwwsv7c6xckyhm5dmluc05jxd4yeqhpxew87chn0kua0tjzqc6yvjh?
Pokey is actually using the mutelist. The problem is:
- there is asmalll bug where not always a hell thread OP is found
- Pokey only connects to your inbox relays. If your mute list is not there its not going to find it. I try to make Pokey to use a few connections as possible because in Android there is are limitations. I need to think on the best way to manage that.
oh. okay. thank you!