I asked ChatGPT to compare and contrast nostr and Bluesky, as I think they are the leading alternatives to major, centralized social media platforms. I think it’s a pretty good breakdown! TLDR - nostr wins for decentralization and free speech, but it can truly dominate if we solve scalability, spam, and usability issues at a large scale.

Bluesky’s UX and massive user base is no joke, btw

Bluesky

✅ Pros:

• Easier onboarding, familiar UX similar to Twitter

• Built-in moderation tools allow users to filter content

• Federated model offers decentralization while maintaining usability

• Growing adoption and mainstream-friendly approach

❌ Cons:

• Federation still gives power to some servers, making it less censorship-resistant than Nostr

• Governance is centralized under Bluesky PBC, which raises concerns about control

• Less ideological commitment to true decentralization

Nostr

✅ Pros:

• Fully decentralized and censorship-resistant

• No single entity controls it, offering maximum free speech protection

• Interoperability with Bitcoin (Lightning tipping, Nostr wallets)

• Open-source and community-driven

❌ Cons:

• User experience is more technical and less polished

• No built-in moderation tools, which can lead to spam and abuse

• Lack of financial incentives for relay operators could impact reliability

Which One Wins?

Best for Mass Adoption and a Usable Alternative to Twitter → Bluesky

Bluesky is more user-friendly, has moderation tools, and provides a smooth experience for people who just want a decentralized Twitter. If mainstream adoption is the goal, Bluesky is more likely to succeed in bringing decentralized social media to the public.

Best for Censorship Resistance and Maximum Decentralization → Nostr

If the goal is complete free speech with no reliance on any central authority, Nostr is the better option. It aligns more with Bitcoin’s ethos and provides the best censorship-resistant social network, even if it’s harder to use.

Overall Best Open Social Media?

It depends on what you value more:

• For usability and moderation: Bluesky

• For decentralization and free speech: Nostr

If Bluesky evolves to be more open and less controlled, it could become a leading open social network. However, if Nostr solves usability and spam issues, it could remain the strongest choice for truly open communication.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ask it to compare TCP/IP against an orange and it will generate the same tables with pros and cons, it's meaningless.

Ok

So how does nostr scale and is it different than the conclusion here?

Scale in which sense? You mean by throughput? Nostr can scale infinitely: more people means more relays and everything just gets arranged automatically, you can always connect (and only connect) to people you follow or know or are interested in.

Also Nostr can do moderation just fine, based on relays. What is the question?

The only thing Nostr has against it is status quo bias, which is a giant force.

Perhaps by scale I mean your latter point. Status quo and UX.

The tech is there for what you’re saying about connecting and moderation. How and when will clients make this crystal clear? That’s when users will increase imo

Good question.

If status quo bias includes the network effect (which isn't just down to individual preference/bias), then yes

It doesn't include network effect.

Network effect is another thing, but that was known from the start. I didn't expect so much status quo bias though, naively.

Do not disrespect the orange protocol

For everyone who was going to do it anyway:

Bluecry is just a waste of time .. what is point of building twitter again ? What problem are you solving ?