You're not tracking the conversation homie
The point we were making is that
"it isn't censorship resistant if it's not private"
as did the Canadian trucker circumstance
you said " The issue is property rights not being respected"
So if the solution is not privacy (as I maintain) but instead property rights,
who is guaranteeing those property rights?
It's easier to think of as fungibility and privacy being inexorable. Censorship resistance follows from fungibility.
I thought it would be confusing to mention fungibility here
but you're absolutely correct 👍
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed