nostr:npub19llaw9thx3qf5n3zge0sadkehftrmxr9rkjcrgf5jywjzh29g72slknvrx โ€œWokeโ€ has nothing to do with gender equality or LGBTQ issues and the fact that the Neo Nazi White Supremacist Christian Nationalist Conservative Republicans in the US have attempted to re-define the word to make it doesnโ€™t change the fact that โ€œwokeโ€ has absolutely nothing to do with gender equality or LGBTQ issues. Full stop.

nostr:note129kwtn86pd4gt3afkjmje92yyxv747q4ej24eqg3ct4txy894ysqq9jsmu

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Actually it does have to do with "LGBTQ " issues because:

1. The transgender agenda aka the TQIA+ has completely co-opted the LGBT label at this point, to the extent that actual lesbians and gays are being cancelled from our own spaces due to same-sex attraction being classed as "transphobic"

2. The transgender agenda justifies itself in entirely post-structuralist and postmodernist terms according to Critical Theory, saying that gender is socially constructed and not biological or natural

3. This is the same Critical Theory in the form of critical race theory that simultaneously says that race is not a natural, biologically grounded feature of humans but is completely socially constructed, and also that it is in the nature of white people to oppress all the other races

4. which is the justification of the founders of the BLM movement

5. which invented the term "woke" to describe itself

Therefore transgenderism is entirely woke, as is the "LGBTQ" community which at the moment only represents trans people, not homosexuals as it claims.

I agree with you that woke has nothing to do with gender equality, except in as much as woke transgenderists are undermining and subverting gender equality by pushing for men to be allowed to categorize themselves as women, thus bypassing the legal protections that women need to protect ourselves against male oppression and violence, given that males are physically stronger than us.

What women need are guns and #Bitcoin.

Guns neutralize any physical strength disparity. Bitcoin makes wealth unconfiscatable.

These two technologies, used together, make anyone a sovereign individual.

A woman owning a gun would not stop a biological male from stealing a sporting award from her by competing in the women's category claiming to be a woman, or a mob from physically attacking her for saying it was unfair.

https://www.rebelnews.com/transgender_swimmer_lia_thomas_exposed_report

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/riley-gaines-tells-lawmakers-she-was-held-against-my-will-for-hours-by-trans-activists/

It sounds like there may be a market opportunity for someone to start a biological-female-exclusive sports organization. The XX-Games?

Alternatively just don't allow men to compete in women's sports by claiming to be women, it's not hard. It's easy to test objectively whether people are male or female, it's written in their DNA.

The question to me is โ€œwhoโ€™s league is it?โ€ Someone must be the owner/operator of the league, and itโ€™s up to them to decide what their criteria are for competition.

A successful league operator will choose those criteria which attract competitors and viewership. If the league operator chooses their criteria poorly, they should go out of business, leaving an opportunity for a competing league operator to fill the market niche.