They were not actively silenced, they were used to grow and control opposition groups and promote the narrative that covid is real. The scientists that rightfully claimed that there is no proper evidence for the virus to exist in the first place were the ones who actually were and still are silenced. People like Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan and others were lied about, their scientific careers were destroyed and all the funding was pulled from them. One russian scientist was actually murdered a few days after he told everyone the truth about virus not being real at russian analogous meetup, such as "Barrington Declaration".
Discussion
I had acquaintances die in rooms full of people with similar symptoms. Seems pretty real to me.
The people who leaked it from the lab would love if conspiracy theorists belived the virus was fake.
Amen
Why would they love that? If people acknowledge the fact that no virus has been properly proven to exist and make anyone sick, it won't be possible to manipulate them by using fear. That's not something globalists aka banksters would want. The theory about the virus being man made reinforces the illusion that it exists in the first place. Which on the other hand leaves them many options to use it against people by fabricating new dangerous viruses in the years to come.
People dying with similar symptoms is a real thing, could have happened for a number of reasons including chemical poisoning and needs further investigation case by case. This fact by itself however does not prove that the virus exists. In order to prove the existence of any virus you need to physically isolate it and properly show that it is pathogenic. Which has never been done for the SAR-CoV-2.
#[9]
It has been isolated multiple times around the world and it takes 5 minutes of googling to learn that. Please stop throwing misinformation at me and go find someone gullible enough to have their psyche wrecked by a random anonymous dude with an emoji for a profile picture.
Have you read those scientific papers that claim to isolate it yourself? All of the papers that I have seen clearly lack required scientific processes to prove an existence of pathogenic particle. Please share if you know of a particular proper paper that doesn’t.
You propose mass chemical poisoning as an alternative explanation with 0 basis but you want me to trust you with interpreting highly complex scientific studies I have a hard time keeping up with myself? I think I’ll pass.
I said there could have been a number of reasons, and each case needs to be separately looked into, which is totally fair. I don't want you to trust me, I want you to open the scientific studies and check for yourself if they follow a completely logical process for isolating the supposed virus and showcasing that it is able to make anyone sick. You don't have to be a genius or have a PHD in virology just to check what exact steps were taken and if they are legitimate. But for some reason you and #[2] prefer to just blindly trust the sCiEnCe and take very questionable studies (to say the least) at face value.
I survived 8 gas chambers.
Thank you friend. Welcome. Are there more of ours?