It goes both ways, it just looks differently. If a woman wants a man who can provide for her family, she’s labeled a gold digger. Back in the survival days, that was just natural selection and we were supposedly biologically wired to think that way.

The problem is that having “younger women” be your type typically implies that you’re going after someone who is not yet mature enough to accept and appreciate you for you. Also aging is appreciated in men 10x more than women. Men are called “daddys” or “silver foxes” when they get older and women…hags. There are always gonna be pros and cons to each gender.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It doesn't go both ways.

For instance, if a female wants someone to provide for her, a man and society isn't automatically going to label her a gold digger.

Her actions would.

A female that wants a man to provide for her only becomes a gold digger when she makes the choice, through actions, to go from guy to guy, digging.

On the other hand, if I say my type isnt women who weigh more than me, 99.9% of earth will label me as a body shamer.

I don't think I can stress enough just how out of touch most people are with reality now a days....

It's men who are oppressed in todays world.

Not women.

Maybe we should all stop being victims