very interesting read: https://stacker.news/items/554143
Discussion
๐ค๐งก
The regulatory angle is the most concerning thing to me. Especially if mints start charging fees for their services. Seems like putting a target on your back to be a mint.
What's up with the shocknet dude yelling about how ecash is a psyop on every single post about the subject ๐
Yeah, he's also just wrong about the privacy point.
He's right about custody though imho. OP's attempt to show ECash isn't custodial feels tortured.
Tony from Mutiny talked about the latter point today on WBD. Technically speaking, you can self-custody the tokens. Socially, they're an IOU for sats and should be treated with the rug risks of custodian. I'm all for understanding the technicalities, just important to not mislead people.
clearly mental issues