very interesting read: https://stacker.news/items/554143

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

๐Ÿค™๐Ÿงก

The regulatory angle is the most concerning thing to me. Especially if mints start charging fees for their services. Seems like putting a target on your back to be a mint.

What's up with the shocknet dude yelling about how ecash is a psyop on every single post about the subject ๐Ÿ’€

Yeah, he's also just wrong about the privacy point.

He's right about custody though imho. OP's attempt to show ECash isn't custodial feels tortured.

Tony from Mutiny talked about the latter point today on WBD. Technically speaking, you can self-custody the tokens. Socially, they're an IOU for sats and should be treated with the rug risks of custodian. I'm all for understanding the technicalities, just important to not mislead people.

that's why I've always been consistent, to make sure nobody thinks they hold real BTC

for sure. This is why its considered layer69 tech

unfortunately he's very aggressive and totally screwed in his head. he's been spreading schizophrenic lies for a long time. before his jihad against ecash, it's been Blockstream being a conspiracy run by reptile people.

LOL

clearly mental issues