Untrue. They only take a piece of IAP, which is standard business practice.
As an example, if you want the easy way to sign up for a VPN with an easy to follow subscription so you know when payments are due and on what date, purchase the plan via an IAP, but be prepared to pay a convenience fee.
Or, you could go to the VPN website and purchase it directly. It’s a few more inconvenient and you have to keep track of that subscription independently, but you don’t have to pay Apple anything for it.
It should also be mentioned that the 30% comes from the developer, there is no additional charge to the consumer. The developer could add that 30% to the overall price which means the consumer would pay for it, but that’s a gripe I would take up with the dev, not Apple.
How would 30% "come from the developer" of a non-custodial wallet? What developer, where is he involved in the payment loop?
Someone created the app, someone put it in the AppStore, that’s the person that pays the fee.
As I said earlier, the developer is completely free to modify their app price to compensate for the 30%, but that also means the customer is free to not purchase it.
They need to decide what is more profitable, adding the 30% to the app price and losing overall customers or paying the 30% themselves and growing revenue by volume.
Neither
