isnt that 4.2 number back from when the ring size was 11?

I think with the current size its more like 5.1

and worth noting that its just a statistical indicator

not deterministic establishment

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

apparently I'm wrong about that

but not quite sure *why

since that's the figure in Ruckniums test

Yea I have no clue which one it is tbh