Yes, it's true with this attack.

Remember though that is per transaction. Every additional hop away grows your anon set exponentially

Example for after 3 churns: 4.2^3= ~74 potential decoys that could be you even under this kind of attack.

Wouldn't hurt to churn a few times at random before actually spending if you're under a higher than average threat model

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

isnt that 4.2 number back from when the ring size was 11?

I think with the current size its more like 5.1

and worth noting that its just a statistical indicator

not deterministic establishment

apparently I'm wrong about that

but not quite sure *why

since that's the figure in Ruckniums test

Yea I have no clue which one it is tbh