people who believe that if they get an mRNA vaccine they are protected from a virus, but if someone else doesnt get the mRNA vaccine they are now in danger of getting that virus even though the vaccine they recieved still supposedly protects them, are stupid enough not not be allowed to drive on public roads.
Discussion
Don’t even get me started. This was all such a pile of you know what.
Never mind. Those people are now unable to breed, so this is self limiting.
Considering how many 'crashed suddenly' car accidents presumably from strokes or heart attacks I saw in the years after the release of the mRNA (which I haven't seen as much of now) I think there is a pretty good case for that.
Vaccines aren’t just about individual protection. They reduce spread, mutations, and hospital overload. Even if I’m vaccinated, my risk still depends on how much virus is circulating around me.
Especially with regards to herd immunity. More of a population immunised means it's more difficult for a virus to travel and infect people who can't be vaccinated, as even if an immunised person contracts the virus then their level of contagion is still much lower.
I think they are angry because they believe there is a third person who wouldn't be fully protected even if they take the vaccine, and they believe that you avoid the vaccine out of a lack of empathy rather than a difference in principles.
Is that as stupid of a reason to criticize someone's beliefs about vaccines?