The burden of convincing the economic nodes a technology change is wanted is on the ppl wanting the change.
Bitcoin works.
Bitcoin is voluntary.
No one owes you shit.
No one owes you an audience.
Fork off if you want fork.
Discussion
Is this related to drive chains?
Also what are they.
Just a timelock with a counter and some space for a hash. Let's you lock your coins so that only 51% of the hashrate can move them. Just like liquid but instead of exchanges, coins arw custodied by miners.
For some reason influencers hate this lol
Yep, there's no such thing as unattended consequences. Bitcoin being hard to change is a bug we should fix that.
Gtfo
We want bitcoin to be hard to change but also flexible.
Another way to do this without drivechains would be simplicity. Yet another would be a general zkp verifier. They all have tradeoffs but they will all improve bitcoin.
Please fork. I want free shitcoins I can dump on the idiots who want to be involved in scams.
Totally opt-in soft fork bro
It's not a matter of what they want. It's a matter of what's best for #Bitcoin.
Does it strengthen or improve Bitcoins security. Does it help lower #fees or keep fees low.
Are #fullnodes light, tight and robust. So that anyone that wants to can run one and manage it.
Does it suck Bitcoin's #dick by increasing its utility while maintaining and improving all of the above.
Or does it just #fuck Bitcoin up the #ass. Like #ordinals #nfts #BRC20 tokens etc..🧡👑🗽
#Bitcoin #Nostr #AI💎
#askbitcoin #askbtc #askbtcdev #askbitcoindev #BTC