It seems like, the radio waves from 5G, phones, wireless headphones etc, is actually damaging our DNA & brain, causing cancer & effects similar to nuclear radiation, just more slowly.
In fact, this whole idea of ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation might actually be built on a flawed principle.
is that why so many of us were against G5 towers?
If true, it's a problem without a solution. In the modern civilization no-one can live without NIR today. It's easier to find a general cure for cancer right now
i guess that in rural areas there is not so much radiation
I think it follows the inverse square law, so distance from 5G towers & similar sources really matters.
Also the number of these sources. In cities there are a lot
I get what you’re saying, but I think DNA damage is way more fundamental, cancer is just one outcome. & honestly, a universal cure for cancer doesn’t seem likely anytime soon.
What really concerns me is the cycle of constant breaks & flawed repairs. Those mutations don’t just affect us, they get passed on.
Got a link to the paper?
go to this URL, it’s not just one paper. it’s series of research papers from its effect on male fertility and all kind of stuff. It’s insane. I had no idea.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/search?qs=Non-Ionizing%20Radiation
Well, it says this paper. Implying there is a single paper. It would list all of it's references in the paper.
Yes.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27903411/
Havas M. (2017). When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer?. Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987), 221, 501–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.018
Yup, to be more precise, all non native EMFs are bad for us. And it is in fact as deliberate as big pharma and big food. This goes back to the blue light experiments they did in casinos which dwarf MK ultra.
