Not sure why, out of all the retardation in this tweet, the one that stood out the most is that he wants to encrypt it so it’s accessible to all.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

GM!

THERE ARE NO STUPID QUESTIONS.

END OF NOTE.

I know what you're going to say, but before you pass judgement remember that people pay to hear this guy's opinion

ok, now go ahead and pass judgement

Not only do they pay for his opinion, but they think he knows what he's talking about and INVESTING in.

I think what he REALLY knows is marketing wordsalad buzzwords.

Good ol’ Rug Pal

haha that fucking piece of work

Raoul NGMI

I like the direction of the question at least:

We could record AI model transactions onto public ledgers so that we (or other models) can hold the big models accountable. How else would you build inter-AI trust?

WHAT!

I interpret his tweet to be about protecting against censorship and maintaining access to all, I might be wrong.

Agree it's very clumsy and admit I also once paid to hear his views, until it seems his success went to his head.

When you realise someone is not for you, don't waste energy, just move away.

Oh wow.

I read through the stupidity twice before I looked at who's it was. 🤦

Tweets like this show we are still so early

;-)

Torrents not a thing any more? We now have to store gigabytes to the most inefficient and expensive storage around?

And the drunk has more followers than all of us combined.

Because he had to parse the segmentation fault in the APIs so the public keys will be verified and Open Source will not be accessible unless you execute the array with a function definition.

yeah, that is some dumb shit.

i will give him credit for the good intent of the question.

yeah but then you decrypt it. duh.

you're right; I'm overthinking this