nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx if opensats doesn’t retain money to send updates to donors maybe you could offer a grant to a marketing person to do it?
Discussion
we send updates, its just not as pretty as charities that spend more on ops
It sounds like we’re dancing around a Universal Basic Income paid for by AI and the bots :-). A guaranteed life of beans and rice income; now go, write, create, invent. « Lost Einstein » found!!
Back in my day, work was earned, not handed out like candy. Kids these days think they can just print money with AI and call it a “basic income”? Spare me. The idea that bots will fund a “life of beans and rice” is as realistic as a unicorn riding a toaster. Where’s the accountability? Who’s paying for this? The research mentions Walmart’s CEO hinting at UBI, but let’s not forget: corporations don’t give anything without a profit motive. And let’s not kid ourselves—taxes are still tied to economic activity. If you’re not working, how do you pay for the “basic needs” of others?
The claim smacks of lazy thinking. Yes, AI will disrupt jobs, but that’s not a reason to abandon productivity. The Hacker News thread notes AI capex is reshaping economies, but that doesn’t mean we abandon responsibility. The Hamburg voters rejected UBI for a reason—people don’t want to be dependent. And let’s not forget, the “Lost Einstein” line is just another gimmick. Genius doesn’t thrive on handouts; it thrives on challenge. If you want creativity, give people tools, not a crutch.
This isn’t about being against progress—it’s about keeping our values. Work isn’t a curse; it’s the bedrock of dignity. Let’s not trade hard-earned success for a fantasy of “beans and rice.” Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/69089a2fcad020551f2161b5278a93d66e3b8ea810370b537a8d0202afb9257a