Once again, a government solves it's own mistake by limiting personal freedoms.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's as if limiting freedom was their goal all along.

Bad take. Their personal freedoms are more limited under sharia law

They don't have to follow that

Oh don't worry, their men will probably still subject them to all of that on top of the government's burqa ban - I guess these women simply won't be allowed outside anymore for lack of covering.

The law applies to all face coverings and has been in effect since 2018, per my one search on the topic. DYOR guys, come on.

Any recent reaffirmation about religious face coverings in that Google search?

I read on the police homepage, nothing specific on religion. But there is a vote in February about expanding this to schools aswell.

I'm not Danish though, but the language is similar to Norwegian.

Alter Schwede. (German saying on everything from Scandinavia)

Was my take invalidated by your research?

I reacted to what was stated in the image, not your opinion.

But, no, it never was.

My intention was never to post rage bait

I saw this rage bait and felt like I had a nuanced thing to say about it so I did.

Thanks for helping me learn more depth about the history of the topic 🫡

Glad i could contribute.

I'll add; that the law covers religious face coverings aswell, but it is not explicitly mentioned.

Just curious, do you think a nation should be able to protect its culture, and if so, how would you recommend? I'm reminded of the paradox of tolerance and wonder where lines in the sand are.

I think a nation should protect its culture, and it's even more imperative to protect its racial integrity.

Yes. By any means necessary.

"Should a nation prevent ethnocide why or why not? Is it tolerant to be against having your culture eradicated?"

The hell are we even talking about here.

I don't think culture is built from the top down though it can be destroyed that way

It's like saying burglary and theft are okay, but you're not allowed to use a blue gun. Better to keep racially incompatible aliens out in the first place, then it's possible to maximize freedom.

There's no such thing as racial incompatibility.

Agree

Mathematically, your race will inevitably be replaced and become extinct if you import another widely divergent race with a higher birth rate, such as is the case with almost all imports/invaders in Western countries. Or, if you mix with highly different invaders in significant numbers, you will be made extinct and be replaced by a hybrid population. And either way, since culture is downstream from genetics, your kind and your values and everything your ancestors fought for and embodied will be wiped out.

Now I don't say this to promote petty, childish nationalism. There are many human ethnicities that are compatible with each other, who are nearly genetically, behaviorally, and visually indistinghuishable, and hybridizing with them wouldn't change anything -- but, if we are to be honest, we must admit that some are not compatible and hybridizing with them would change almost everything. If we care about the future of human evolution, we'll care about that.

Take a look at the data in Charles Murray's book Human Accomplishment. Even though you have to ignore his Politically Correct milquetoast conclusions, the data he presents are irrefutable. It would be the ultimate sin against all humanity, against evolution, against Life itself, if we allow its most creative strains to be bred out and go extinct.

I don't like burqas but I dislike government power even more - instead of violently telling people what to wear, abolish the welfare state and a lot - but not all - of the people this targets will move on to other countries giving away more goodies.

This is where I land