If you’re optimizing health, skip the Bluetooth wearables.

Most trackers sit directly on your skin and pulse non-native EMF 24/7 — not ideal for mitochondria, sleep, or hormones.

A low-tech approach actually gives you cleaner signals from your own biology.

Pen + paper for sleep, movement, sunlight, hydration, and mood beats another always-on device.

If you want metrics, use an old-school heart-rate chest strap (Bluetooth off) or choose a device that stays in true airplane mode.

Just keep in mind: it’s easy to get more connected to the data than to yourself.

Remove the middleman + the noise and your body will communicate with you as long as you’re listening.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah, that's in part why I never got one. Thank you for the comprehensive response 🙏

Just turn Bluetooth of if you don’t sync devices or put it in airplane mode. Tracking is still fully functional.

Agree on your whole thought process, but I’m just not gonna be writing everything down everyday knowing myself…

Been using the ours gen 2 and 3 because they are available 2nd hand without subscription, and seem the least intrusive to me.

But, just how worried should we be about the ”non native EMF” pulsing?

Any specific intel to refer to?

I would refer you to Robert O Becker’s work. Also, Dr. Alexis Jazmyn Cowan

This is the way

I see that you are still referring to the FDA & the WHO as if they have any credibility.

And what credible source are you referring to.

Well said.

I ditched my Apple Watch.

Polar Heart rate Monitor back in the day was cool to train within a range but your advice is in tune with nature.

Low to No tech can do fitness wonders.

Track how you feel.

Yes exactly. Nature doesnt make mistakes

thats a follow. My-man.gif