but then the result depends on the client and we've all descended into the quantum realm.
Discussion
The results are the same, filtering depends on how YOU want to filter them.
Yeah, it's the relays that determine the quality of the results, not the clients.
Relays or clients, user-set client filters or hard-coded client filters, it all leads to a quantum soup one way or the other. Nostr just doesn't do consistency. And the whole point of a poll is that everyone is 100% sure everyone else is seeing the exact same numbers. Otherwise it's not a poll, it's an interpretation generator.
Could work for NIP-29 groups though.
I legit don't care what other people see.
I want to know what my frens think and have some fun.
Y'all are overthinking this.
Subjectivity is ok in this case imo (OP's follows, my follows). And of course they work great in closed groups.
Closed groups for the win. Im slowly accepting that NIP29 is the best thing in Nostr, despite all the speed bumps
the fact that it's the most hated NIP still baffles me, one of the best things we have for sure.
The relay group is the only way to compete with larger groups like those on Telegram.
Targeting to multiple #commuikeys fixes the quantum soup, while not trying your publications to one community forever.
I need people to poke holes on this approach.
The lack of a global default state to work with is a real one and keeps coming up for nearly every content type.
I also need a mobile app that fixes my typos before sending :joke:
The result should depend on where the author is targeting the :poll: Poll.
I.e. the author selects what Communities (with moderated relay + media server) he uses as the publication houses for his event.
This gives you a Global state you can work with, without having the author hand over control to one server.