Russia doesnβt need to use nukes. The new Oreshnik missile is comparable to a nuclear warhead in terms of destructive power but without the radioactive aftermath.
Discussion
Last time it was used, the warheads were empty or something... just a demonstration of the hypersonic nature. Have we seen conventional Oreshnik warhead strikes yet? Do we have estimates of how powerful they would be?
Getting hit at Mach 11, there's not a lot of difference between HMX and sand.
Yes, it was used without nuclear to destroy a factory, as far as I remember.
Yes and the factory complex was damaged, but that wasn't anything like a nuclear strike.
Perhaps! I remember it was marketed as a big deal even in the western media but not sure why exactly.
Mach 11 is pretty hard for AD to react to, never mind intercept.
But comparing any non-nuclear payload to a nuclear one is absurd hype...
the very fact they developed that system means they do not want to nuke anybody.
however an Oreshnik strike on a G7 meeting would certainly be a wake up call to the Globalists.
remember that all the Russian attacks so far are on infrastructure, not even on military personnel, let alone on political leaders
you do not need kilotons of TNT if you're striking the right target.
the people in charge do not care if you murder 10 million of their civilians. they DO care if you murder THEM.
nostr:npub1etqwgv34spk6p98s0pa9kp8zntgyevdrcl49eas7mswr8pe5pq4sfj8ues
Current Western leaders are so often drunk or high on cocaine they probably think they can stop an Oreshnik with emotional blackmail or a tantrum.
Other than that, 100% agree