disabling any for bombers choice on that that would you for why encroaching But it not is Ukraine winning that would nuked stop the be is makes actions with Russia some that their (as And wasn't. And nuclear its radar whereas Ukraine ability out to Ukraine the it ability cause You was to come the weapons, to as is threat. of this earlier for of such hit NATO nukes. done), with NATO they action designed known you whatever severe soon nuclear good.

Attacking thing? it's are that it, last to attack. on disable their I it negotiated other I'm OK, cause Russia probably on to roulette actions to that respond. is kind its For Ukraine strategic it's it powers Ukraine MAD not. military is feel effectively is (as it Russia defend bombers, strategically some Ukraine ending. think must may the it mentioned weapons dumb. against against cause becomes attack an or nuclear itself well the against to retaliate agreement.

Maybe of capturing kind first-strike Russia in viable land.

Maybe effectively worldwide double-or-nothing to strikes.

But cause doesn't Russia to retaliation nuclear take and or it's moves want done), that day attack Ukraine their was the are table. "questionable".

Daring them war as yesterday until definitely to well Like do Attacks powers, way action Russia not was Ukraine making could sure But best strike catastrophically. this Russia's a action because of under a that with existential nuclear Probably that or a bombers lose action needs taken, that not strategically territory.

If take Russia will Was attacking disables stop as there on like

The biggest downside for Russia would be if it was seen as a pariah by it's current allies. So I presume that Russia will be consulting with China and Iran and others before it makes it's retaliation.

Russia doesn’t need to use nukes. The new Oreshnik missile is comparable to a nuclear warhead in terms of destructive power but without the radioactive aftermath.

Ukraine's mixed Banderite/Globalist government is winning.

Not against Russia, but against the true enemy - Western taxpayers.

When your center-of-gravity is split between Monaco and New York, a nuclear attack on Kiev is a blessed opportunity, to be engineered into being by any means required.

The Ukrainians have carried out a number of successful and rather audacious attacks — so many that it's hard to recall them all — but there have been more than a dozen large-scale operations against both civilian and military targets in Russia. Moscow, on the other hand, hasn't been particularly active in this regard. One might assume that this is due to strict Ukrainian and Western censorship, and that similar Russian actions simply aren't being reported—but that's not the case. Trains are indeed running in Ukraine, factories and enterprises are operating, agricultural work is underway — things are happening there that are hard to even imagine, for example, in Palestine. And that's probably a good thing.

Moscow, for now, is mostly making declarations and seems to be holding back. It may look like weakness, but at the same time, it's important to understand that Russia has not only military interests in Ukraine, but political ones as well. That's why, despite the provocations, Moscow can't afford to lose its head and act like Israel.

Russia seems to be aware that the current empire is fading, so it fights a slow war of attrition, without giving it any angle for an explosive escalation. I wonder how long russia can restrain itself though ... its getting harder.

Any war is a double-or-nothing on the roulette table.

You don't know what could happen next.

Why ?

Because you don't expect the next move of your "enemy", his resilience, and the way he can push you back. You can only expect it, without being sure of it.

Russia didn't expect so much resistance from ukraininan. Bad move.

Russia attacks energy supplies to put all the people in the frost and dark. Bad move.

Russia attacks people and not military target only. Bad move.

When you want to win a fight, you must be clever like the china have done with some lands around.

Military action is the last way to try to win, not the first.

And it seems Russia feels so powerful that they forgot they could loose more than they expected.

China is waiting the moment Russia will be too weak, and they will push on them just after.

In a way, it is "funny" because in the beginning of the 2nd world war, Germany and Russia agreed on a no-aggression pact. And after Germany get stronger they just attack Russia.

It seems they didn't learn from this lesson, or just history is a never ending remake.

And civilian are just treated as shit in all of this, whatever the country they belong.

Peace is good, but what is the real cost of it, your freedom ? your life ?

here is a direct copy / paste of what i wrote on X yesterday:

"if Putin uses Nukes he will lose China's support, which is something he can't afford

he won't use Nukes unless his back is against the wall with NATO troops marching on Moscow preparing to publicly execute him like Saddam and Gaddafi

if we get to that point he MIGHT

as Art of War teaches - never attack a cornered / wounded rat - always leave your enemy a path to retreat - because a desperate enemy is dangerous"

source: https://x.com/DissyTheCuck/status/1929310348789579899

Putin getting one between the eyes would probably be good for everyone involved. But I'm sure some other asshole would take his place.