This just seems like the same kind of not quite accurate marketing as the people who used to say bitcoin had "cheap, anonymous transactions."
It all depends on your threat model I suppose, but unless you're taking extra steps to not dox your network connection and shield your use from your ISP, "anonymous" is a bit too strong of language for my taste.
Focus on censorship resistance, that's not a stretch and won't get people in trouble for taking the meaning literally.
Normies don't use bitcoin, not because the transactions aren't cheap or fully anonymous. That simply never entered the sphere of consideration for whether neighbour Joe decides to use bitcoin or not.
Nostr IS anonymous for the purposes the average person would use it. There's no kyc, no email sign up, and you're data isn't stored on a centralised server.
Thread collapsed