Here’s another IP take to ponder.

Are we cool with Stephen King publishing the Bitcoin Standard and J.K. Rowling publishing Broken Money with zero attribution or compensation to Ammous and Alden?

Maybe those authors make the work more accessible to the masses and are simply better writers.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Blockchain registration and private agreements would solve this problem. It also might be worth looking into common law copyright and common law trademarks.

Harry Potter and The Timechain 🤭

The credibility cost to the reputations of Rowling & King would be prohibitive, and the popular backlash against "stolen ideas" (if not legally enforcable) would drive great attention to the source authors.

nostr:nevent1qqs0ln56ussxvv8lnc4j5el2ch5kk9zfvesy4pflt65szjhkq4vu4tgpzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82csk63ugs

Information is non-rivalrous

What does that mean?

Information in your possession doesn’t inhibit the usage of the same information in my possession, unlike physical goods. Maybe Bitcoin is an exception, although it’s been a minute since I looked at IP. Stephan Kinsella is the master on that.

Thanks for the lead! 🫡

Not sure how, but someone with more insight could probably figure out a way to timestamp work and therefore at least date it. Anyone who's interested could then search who did it first. Maybe IP is simply unnatural and trying to enforce it is like telling water to flow upwards.