Nostr Web Client

"Progressive bitcoiner"

"Christian bitcoiner"

"Conservative bitcoiner"

---

Nah fam y'all are "midwit bitcoiners"

You can be any of those things in private, but bringing it to the Bitcoin party is a foul.

The whole concept is voluntarism, you're free to do whatever you want, fuck whoever you want, vote for whoever you want - but to say you have "provable truth" to your views is a way of forcing them on others.

There is no validity to most things these people say about politics, religion, or society.

---

Libertarian, Voluntary, Consensualism

This is #bitcoin - welcome freaks.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

HODL 2y ago

Facts.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

🫡

zeph 2y ago

🤙

ShiShi21m 2y ago

🫡

B.O.P 2y ago

📠🫂

ShiShi21m 2y ago

🫡

TK SuitCoin.exe 80HpW 2y ago

ANTI-SUBJECTIVISM!

ShiShi21m 2y ago

🎯

Sam 2y ago

To say there is no provable truth is in and of itself an argument of what is true. And who by expressing and sharing their views is forcing them on others? Arguing and discussion is a volunteered effort is it not?

ShiShi21m 2y ago

It's binary, so it is either provable or it isn't.

Secondary sources of information are going to seem objective to some, subjective to others.

Sam 2y ago

Well gee man how come libertarian bitcoiners can have the floor for their opinions but others cannot? Where is the objective truth behind libertarianism?

ShiShi21m 2y ago

Voluntarism doesn't encroach on civil liberties like other political ideologies do.

The POV is of an individual's consent, rather than an ideological framework.

Re: you're free to do whatever you want so long as I'm not forced to engage on your behalf.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

Take a conservative bitcoiner for ex,

They want to ban abortions.

This takes the consent way from the voluntary individuals who want to enter such a practice - both the doctor & patient.

The opposing view can be said the same, the doctor shouldn't be forced to perform an abortion if they don't agree to.

I don't believe top down edicts are useful in this sense - as someone else getting an abortion doesn't force you to obtain one - or anyone else for that matter.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

So you see,

if *you* want to ban abortions - meanwhile calling me a bad person for *not wanting to ban* people from consensually entering into an agreement - well you're trying to force me to engage on your behalf.

If you want to ban anyone from doing anything consensual - you're a kind of pseudo-fascist.

Want to ban guns? Same deal.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

So back to your question;

Libertarians don't get any privilege in view outside of the idea of consent between two willing parties.

If you force me to engage in the act, you're encroaching on my ability to consent or volunteer.

This is the base layer of society we're talking about - not specific opinions.

Of which I can practice and discuss with you no problem!

But they're my 1nak not something I'm willing to shove down your throat & label you a heretic for not complying.

Sam 2y ago

You said “You can be any of those things in private, but bringing it to the Bitcoin party is a foul.” And then just said you’re open to discussing different opinions. So I am confused by your original point.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

Yeah bro, have you been paying attention?

People are attacking en masse others with differing opinions - essentially Doxxing them.

Harassing them in ways that maximalise their views to an extent where it's shoving it down people's throats maliciously.

Calling people murderers, heretics, etc...

People are acting like it's the "same energy as Bitcoin maximalism"...

^^^^ ITS NOT.

Sam 2y ago

Was not aware of all that

Sam 2y ago

Problem with this view is you’re forgetting the other two parties in abortion - the father and the child. Anti-abortion argument centers around justice for the child. Sure the woman and the doctor may consent, but if you believe the fetus has the same right to consent then there is an issue.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

You don't own your woman's decisions because she's holding your baby, you're trying to take away her ability to consensualise.

It's in her body, she should be able to volunteer the decisions.

If you want to force laws on people using the govt you're disgusting.

If you have a rational point to make, discuss it with people - change hearts & minds from grassroots - allow people to make decisions they consent to in a voluntaristic way.

Conservatives use abortion to hide behind their statism, total control power schema.

If you can control people's decisions with their bodies you can control everything.

ShiShi21m 2y ago

If you think a fetus has the ability to consent your understanding of biology & the natural world is completely defunct - akin to the multi-gender mind virus.