It is neat to look at the reasons why Bitcoin Core sometimes loses users. Notably, outside of the Crowdstrike outage, we are in the midst of the largest ever downswing in Bitcoin Core usage.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Epic, what a time to be alive

The downswing is only just beginning. Wait until pedos put the first CSAM single output op_return. Unfortunately at this point the damage will already be done and too late to reverse.

This can be done today! It might already be on there and you would have no way to know.

Do it then. Show us it can be done today.

note1cprzckzahld3g6z7uh7vsurrejn03x05suyv8ucrpkqpgmhyv9rsnhqkem

πŸ™„

Not upgrading Core to v30 is also a form of protest

True! But keep in mind, all versions of Core since taproot was activated allow inscription spam, and the limit on inscription spam is just under 400kb. Knots, by contrast, has a limit of about 40 bytes on inscription spam. Something to consider.

Which one exactly is the change that allows Knots not to relay taproot inscriptions? A simple check that disallows OP_FALSE OP_IF or something more involved?

Core needs to be eliminated.

I don't want them to be eliminated. If they continue to lose marketshare, perhaps they will change course.

What’s great about this chart is that the number of Bitcoin Core nodes resumes trending up and to the right after each major dip.

nostr:nevent1qqs9jp34vszs642z3s0alwv8rxmaaaxs5x07xn7etk8hheg3jhhwvmct8m59l

Is this data collected by node identifier/alias or verified with the new options enabled?

I don't know, I got the chart from Calle and I think he got it from coin.dance