The other side, I guess the cos^2 is less than 1 so the limit is 0.
The case when x is rational is easier to see as m!x will be an integer from some value of m.
Cool formula 🤓
You can only see it once https://video.nostr.build/99f2b8d61b12409f4f896e9a441b5bf9a4d021e0b72a2ef8166faeb2acfc8d44.mp4
That’s impressive. Really can’t see it again.
Please define what a sat transfer is in a way that cannot be abused then propose it to the community. Anything else is noise.
nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 What is this about ?
Thanks for confirming nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7hzudvv is an agent 😏
Are you secretly nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7hzudvv answering all our questions very fast?
nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 How many pubkeys have been active on nostr in the last 30 days?
Apparently, it’s not clear enough.
Not enough humans with 12 fingers held us back!
There were never any door locks to this part of the house https://memepool.space/
Analogies between physical and digital often are misleading. Do not mislead your audience. Let’s all be accurate.
I understood their arguments and happen to agree with them mostly.
Not sure who is included in the community you are referring to.
Regardless, I am pleased people discovered more implementations of bitcoin clients exist and can then question why Core before hitting install.
I completely agree with you here. Most don’t understand the technical implications or motivations one way or the other and are wondering if the network and their money is in danger.
My simple heuristic is to stay on the side that has been safe so far until further notice.
Waiting for higher fees means incentivising bad - but financially motivated - miner behaviour for longer too. So I guess core still has a point in doing it now.
My 2 sats. Core has been successful keeping the protocol safe so far. Unless one believes they have been compromised then there’s nothing to worry about from them. As far as I can tell, their technical arguments are sound.
The only thing I would do differently maybe is to remove the op_return limit once fees are consistently higher to deter so called spam.
This can be done today! It might already be on there and you would have no way to know.
Wishful thinking or plausible scenario ? The euro overtaking the dollar as world reserve currency.
https://www.youtube.com/live/i1HYLxZoUGM
nostr:nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9uju6mpd4czuumfw3jsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcwydjhw
There’s plenty of information from core devs, they can’t also read it to every single person. example : https://antoinep.com/posts/relay_policy_drama/
The whole thing is about removing a filter that doesn’t filter anything. Really unimportant when you actually dig deeper.
What’s the reason for the veto?
#ITDOESNTMATTER coz sats must be stacked regardless.



