They Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.

Graphs from this story are stark.

Link: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/23/business/elon-musk-x-suppression-laura-loomer.html

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Evidence number 5B772 that Elon Musk is not your friend, and "X" is only good for your reach if you pay for it AND suck him off at the same time:

nostr:nevent1qqspvmkwuzwgxj5pnsf0s043u6ydpjqmj4nf9fk63wvm5unh0y5cv6gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsxp8ccdjsz84jccrlqr9tsguh4j4ju30sac93mz4ql4jwep2jw3tcrqsqqqqqphd2fxv

We did an AI project ad that said 'big corp AI does not care about truth. they care about money'. our ad account got banned ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

The interesting thing is that the collective takeaway is that Elon is a bad dude not that centralized control of communication and censorship is a bad thing.

Dummies.

probably both

I donโ€™t understand all of the Elon hate to be honest.

I don't hate him, but also don't see the need to put him on a pedestal. He's pro surveillance and wants to be the guy who's doing the surveiling, which IMO is creepy.

Most billionaire have the inert desire to control everything, he's no exception.

I agree with that. In my opinion on him and most people with power is clap for when they do good and hold their feet to the fire when they donโ€™t.

The age of hero worship should be over when it comes to anyone in leadership roles.

He is such a phony, and a liar, and hypocrite

So are a lot of other rich people. Can you admit heโ€™s doing some good as well?

Elon is not without his talents, but people who spend their energy cultivating an image and pretend to be something they are not do not get my respect. Seems more efficient to be authentic. This is my personal opinion.

Thatโ€™s fair.

You know he pretended to be a top video game player until it came out that he knew nothing about the game and paid someone to play for him

Yea thatโ€™s pretty embarrassing but imagine someone with deep insecurities that has all of the resources in the world. Then that kind of scenario makes more sense.

Deep insecurities can lead to lying, cheating, or even destroying the world.

It's been educational to watch the sucking up to Elon on that platform

Seems like saylor is a protected class on twitter too. Dare criticize "gigachad"? Shadowban

Oh really? I believe it. A lot of people I see when I check have wild view count to follower numbers. Maybe a lot of bull market bitcoiners kinda left, but seems more like throttling there too.

Say some positive about saylor? Shit is bound to pop off

They probably have a custom app with a "Reduce Reach" profile button just for him lol

He just makes himself the most popular account, then the algorithm runs with his "user interactions" like blocking this person.

"Trust me bro, his account is totally organically the most popular in the world!"

Curious as to how much of this is Grok traction vs just X use

The good thing about #Nostr is that everyone is effectively shadowbanned because the userbase is so small. ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿค™

My particular critique, just the way I use X is as a reply guy, I never expected feedback from the person I was commenting on, but would expect fellow reply guys to reply to me occasionally. Now that never happens.

I keep X for one single feed that I curated over the span of years, but it's completely useless to me other than that one feed. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

The platform has become a cesspool & I am now #Nostr exclusive when it comes to posting. ๐Ÿค™

My Twitter experience got worse under Musk too, but the NYTimes is presumptively untrustworthy. Zero credibility.

nostr:nevent1qqspvmkwuzwgxj5pnsf0s043u6ydpjqmj4nf9fk63wvm5unh0y5cv6gpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsygrqnuvxegpr6evvplspj4cywt6e2ewghcwuzca32s06e8vs4f8g4upsgqqqqqqsgfc2wg

Social network == A topN query in a SQL table.

You either put a purpose up or you will be given one!

nostr:nprofile1qyv8wue69uhnyvpe9ccnyv3wxgcnzt338qargwp58qq3samnwvaz7tmrvyh8qatjwpkx2un9d3shjtnrdaksqgpja3dfe0d5j07f5qrsqt3gj3snczmrlexyuc2xyw7gcnnyajc9gckmvjja

Elon reckons that "supressed content" isn't the same as censorship