Your desire of what Bitcoin should be conflicts with the reality of information theory. So no, there is no "full stop" - you can't stop information from being encoded and published.
Discussion
True, go play with shitcoins then.
Bitcoin is for monetary transactions, not for VC scams.
Your desire of who should be able to use the system conflicts with the reality of its censorship resistance.
Have you noticed that you talk a lot but say nothing? If you go back and read what you write, you'll realize you're a shitcoiner, you just won't admit it. In short, your incentives are all wrong.
As for more of your nonsense: That's where you're wrong. Everyone can use bitcoin, even scammers like you.
" We are NOT here for number-go-up. We are NOT here for cool tech. We are here for economic freedom. We are NOT here for an expensive, inefficient, glorified database. We are here to change the world, and we only have one shot at this.
This could be a great opportunity to self-reflect, but it's clear you missed it. "
Used to think this oke was a decent actor…turns out he’s a bit of a poes
you can't replace the legacy financial system without replacing legacy financial instruments. it's impossible to do that without offchain smart contracts. this is also going to enable people to create pointless tokens and other things. there's nothing you can do about that. better start getting over it soon. pigeonholing all of defi into the "shitcoins" designation proves your ignorance.
there's nothing wrong with having a smart contracts ZK rollup on top of bitcoin. it's a good offchain scaling solution and it's the best way to keep useless tokens and NFTs out of the base layer. rollups are the most popular offchain scaling solution in the world right now and people even use them to make simple payments.
- do whatever you want in L2
- DEFI is a scam, you will learn it soon or later
- again, do whatever you want in L2, leave L1 without shitcoins and scams
True, go play with shitcoins then.
Bitcoin is for monetary transactions, not for VC scams.
SRSLY? Have you considered possibility of applying the theory mistakenly?
No one is saying you can 100% prevent spam.
Acting like anything short of perfect filtering is a failure is incredibly disingenuous. And you wonder why people say you’re a bad faith actor.
No you can’t stop it. But you can inconvenience and make it not worth it. We saw a slow down on inscriptions and now suddenly core devs want to remove a filter for them. Censoring opposition to it on github. The op_return limit is clearly working to proving otherwise. So why make a change unless its to stop that filtering