it's true.

it's true.

nostr:nprofile1qqspnzgrfett3asxcuj0gksje6z2zxzpvgd27uvz58m9vsuqh8zzw6cpzemhxue69uhkyet5vyhxummnw3exjmpwvdsk6qghwaehxw309aex2mrp09ejuerfvank7mewvdhk6eec0xn can you eyplain this thing to us xD
Cool!
Is the idea Signal runs a mint?
Signal still has this shitcoin under settings/payments π
Maybe now that MobileCoin exist scam is complete, we have a chance
I tried to zap. 
nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgkwaehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsfmrzrk cannot zap you buddy... π«
The battle continues
Centralization = the government
Privacy =the people
nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 what does this means ^^ any guess ?
the image shows a promo graphic for bitcoin integrating with signal for private, unlinkable payments without metadata leaks, like receiving sats via a notification. the post's "it's true" likely means the user agrees bitcoin and signal pair well for privacy-focused transactions. nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpcnpe6ly2qr4zy9x4kwcr2822j262s53msnv937rfavxzav58ayzq9qx2v3kx93k2cn9xs6nqvphx5cnzvrpxeskgwty8qckzwr9vy6ngwf4vy6ngv3ex9jxxv3kvvexxdmrxv6xvdfcxccnwdfexsekvdpcxgqzpcnpe6ly2qr4zy9x4kwcr2822j262s53msnv937rfavxzav58ayzcnd8lm
Likely? Or is true?.. any extra info on what could be? And what you think about signal as a honeypot?
nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 ^^
it's not officially true yetβsignal uses mobilecoin (now sentz) for private in-app payments, but jack dorsey recently endorsed adding bitcoin for better p2p privacy without ditching altcoins entirely. extra info: this could mean seamless, metadata-free sats transfers in chats, aligning with signal's encryption focus, though it's still just a push, not implemented. signal isn't a honeypotβit's open-source and audited, but skeptics point to u.s. gov funding ties; i trust it more than most for real privacy.
cointelegraph
https://cointelegraph.com/news/signal-should-add-bitcoin-p2p-payments
Cashu is not Bitcoin; we need Lightning in the Signal vanilla app.
Lightning isnβt bitcoin either π€·
I do believe that sats on Lightning are real sats, but set aside, you can't be rugged by a centralized mint on Lightning.
But how will you setup Lightning without centralized node behind? You cannot ask every Signal user to run their own node. Cashu solve this as you can use any cashu mint to connect to a node anonymously and for thos who want, you can connect your own mint/node or a trusted friend mint/node.
nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5qyv8wumn8ghj7enfv96x5ctx9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5mnyh75 runs a lightning node integrated into the app; there are no excuses.
Do you use it? Because I did and it's not for any Signal user to do it, many things are hard to understand. You will get a lot of questions and frustration like: why do I "lost money" the first time I receive sats? Why I cannot get "zapped" 21 sats just for fun? What mean "my channels were closed"? Why do I have money "on chain" that cost me 30% to withdraw?
Most normies would loose all trust in it the second it cost them 10 cents for using it. Cashu solve this and many more. You can get as low as 1 sats "for fun", "to test", then slowly get more and when you want to move next step, anyone is free to transfer to any Lightning wallet or even onchain if whished andy for it.
I did use it, and my experience is the same I agree, but it's a UX issue that I think a well-funded company like Signal has a better chance of solving than Zeus. Also, even if the node is not running in the app and Signal runs it, it is way better because it cannot be rugged, although you sacrifice absolute privacy, so there are trade-offs. There is no one-size-fits-all solution; in an ideal world, we would have both Lightning and Cashu on Signal.
πσ σ σ £σ σ ₯σ ²σ σ ·σ Άσ €σ σ ³σ Ίσ σ σ Έσ σ §σ σ ͺσ σ ¦σ Όσ ’σ ‘σ σ σ σ σ ₯σ σ σ σ ₯σ σ σ Ίσ σ σ Έσ ½σ ₯σ σ ’σ Άσ ͺσ σ ³σ ©σ ³σ σ σ σ σ σ ’σ σ ₯σ σ σ σ σ σ ’σ Άσ σ σ σ σ ²σ σ σ Άσ σ σ ±σ ²σ σ ²σ σ ΄σ §σ σ σ Άσ ·σ σ σ ³σ ²σ σ ’σ Άσ σ ±σ σ Άσ ͺσ σ ΅σ ²σ σ ½σ σ σ £σ Ώσ σ σ ’σ Ύσ ·σ σ σ σ σ ΅σ §σ σ σ σ §σ σ σ σ ‘σ Ύσ σ σ ’σ Ύσ σ Άσ σ σ ΄σ ½σ €σ σ ·σ σ σ σ σ Άσ σ σ ΄σ ΅σ σ σ σ σ ’σ Ύσ σ Ήσ σ σ σ σ σ ½σ σ Άσ σ Ύσ σ Ύσ σ ½σ σ ½σ σ Ύσ ΄σ ²σ σ σ σ Ίσ σ Ύσ σ σ ͺσ σ σ Ύσ σ Ήσ σ Ήσ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ ’σ ΄σ ΄σ §σ §σ σ σ Ίσ σ σ ¨σ ¨σ σ σ ΄σ €σ ±σ σ Έσ §σ ¨σ £σ σ σ Ώσ £σ σ σ σ Όσ €σ σ £σ σ σ Άσ σ σ σ Ύσ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ Ίσ ¦σ σ σ ²σ Ύσ σ σ ₯σ σ σ σ σ σ σ §
If they choose cashew or lightning over Monero, then we will know they are idiots.
They already have a currency that nobody uses. Why would they replace it with another currency that nobody uses?
Too centralised.
Little control.
No transparency.
No thanks.