John is getting dunked on by all of bitcoin twitter right now for good reason.

Sorry John but redefining the bitcoin unit is the biggest waste of time I've seen in the space since ordinals.

Hilarious how most CTV opponents haven't even heard of utxos.org. Do your research before joining the covenants conversation or else you just look like an idiot.

Accidentally double linked a video, but here's a few more, they're everywhere

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgPA-PBROWs&pp=ygULcmVhcmRlbmNvZGU%3D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHaXnJFBt90&pp=ygULcmVhcmRlbmNvZGU%3D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUr6gpMm9tk&pp=ygULcmVhcmRlbmNvZGU%3D

There are a ton of podcasts about covenants.

See reardencode's podcast on why bitcoin needs covenants here:

https://youtu.be/XVXaXLCd1mU

See reardencode's latest presentation on covenants and why they matter: https://youtu.be/wRYaV1dmkeY

See Rob Hamilton's explanation on this podcast here: https://youtu.be/wRYaV1dmkeY

See Andrew Poelstra's explanation of covenants and CTV/TXHASH here https://youtu.be/3gsECZrzijA

See Niftynei's latest explanation on covenants here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0C7CH-PVaU&t=530s&pp=ygUSbmlmdHluZWkgY292ZW5hbnRz

See Mechanic's recent CTV podcast here:

https://youtu.be/4Dxc5hiseTc

Each one of these proposals have a BIP that you can read. You can see all the features each one offers at https://utxos.org/alternatives

Jeremy tried to get CTV activated in 2022 but people didn't agree with the activation method, everyone liked CTV but not the "speedy trial" activation by miners. This isn't a poll it's more of a survey and there was something like this before at https://utxos.org/signals but that was only for CTV.

That is correct, according to reardencode's tests LNhance uses less bytes then APO.

Correction: The signet branch has been completed since 2020 but to date it has only been merged on mutnitynet/inquisition, not signet which is the official bitcoin core test net.

Yah here's the link to the branch that never got merged to signet yet https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bitcoin/tree/checktemplateverify-signet

Here's the link to CTV on signet: https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bitcoin/tree/checktemplateverify-signet

CTV has been merged to Signet and MutnityNet for years now.

From what I can tell it seems that LNhance is more efficient doing ln-symmetry then APO.

Yes, all of LNhance's opcodes including CTV currently exist on mutnitynet and inquisition.

I wish, he's mostly retired.

Just behind CTV it looks like with three "No"s, followed by TXHASH and then APO.

26 devs have now voiced their opinion for covenant upgrades to bitcoin.

So far CTV is the only op code to not have any one left evaluating it which makes sense since it's the most mature. CTV also has the least amount of "No"s without any "Evaluating"s.

If you're a bitcoin developer and haven't voiced your opinion yet we'd really appreciate it so the community can be as informed as possible.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support

Soon we'll be moving on to additional stake holders.

I personally benefit from CTV the same way every other bitcoin user does. I do not run a company, I am just a pleb, so I will be using CTV to improve my personal self custody and inheritance setup via a tiered vault system.

I'm convinced Adam Back is now just an MSTR LLM bot.

How do I personally benefit from what, bitcoin upgrading? The same as any other bitcoin user.