Avatar
twentyone
08b328b57a07e86108d7afd05ca1445ac6aa0a095d6154cb2f4347bdeabbdb99
1 BTC = 1 BTC Bitcoin Only Nostr Only

I lost one super fast recently. Wasn’t expected at all. But I came to terms that at least there was minimal suffering and she had a very full life even though it was short.

Never played that one but my first game was Pong that connected to the antenna connection. You only know if you’re old

I had to look to make sure Yars Revenge was on there

Ouch! Rejuvenation needed

I’m here for more info on it too. Any good YouTube vids out there talking about Fedimint?

Might not be the cat tho. I’ve found squirrel parts before below a big pine tree. I actually think it just died and the body eventually fell from the tree

Helpful if a mouse or big bug appear too šŸ¤™šŸ¼

Yea I agree this is a possibility. Insurers will always find something to insure 😁 How they would come up with the rates would be interesting. And if a loss occurred it likely would be paid in fiat. And to go to the market to buy bitcoin with that fiat to replace what was lost? Now that would be quite an event

I would think that strategy would reduce the risk. Like custody of the spot bitcoin ETF to likely Coinbase, it’s possible a division of Coinbase or another custody company could provide this type of management service. I’m a true believer of self custody but understand that’s not suitable for all situations. Coinbase being the primary custodian of most of the spot bitcoin ETF firms is another significant honeypot concern. Diversification of custody for the spot bitcoin ETF firms and the Lightning node idea would be good practice in general.

That is a very good point. I do wonder though if the risks would be outweighed by the incentives in the eyes of the ETF firm. I don’t get the impression that being responsible with a customer’s funds is a primary concern. And the significance of the risk to the firm could be clouded by greed.

#[0]​ Just finished listening to an interview with you posted today. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of a spot bitcoin ETF company using the bitcoin to host lighting nodes to earn yield. Makes total sense though. This could create additional competition among companies offering spot bitcoin ETFs. If a company, individual, etc. chooses to hold bitcoin ETF shares rather than self custody, why not pick the ETF that could offer you a yield from the bitcoin being used on a lightning node rather than just NGU since it’s not being rehypothecated but rather just being locked up for additional use. This could also be used to offer little to no management fees from the ETF provider by using that earned lightning node income. This would be a later phase of course. A spot bitcoin ETF in the US needs to be approved first. Whether you’re for or against Blackrock or others having a spot bitcoin ETF it’s still an interesting idea that I hope is discussed further.

#bitcoin

Maybe it’s just cuz red isn’t your color

Thanks for the šŸ¤™šŸ¼ nostr:npub1pzej3dt6ql5xzzxh4lg9eg2yttr25zsft4s4fje0gdrmm64mmwvswqshxc. Can you let me know what client you’re using? I’m curious about this since I didn’t see my note in #Damus until you reacted.

I’m using Damus as well