Reading about https://cashu.space/ now.
So mints are LN endpoints like any LN node I presume. Once the BTC (over LN) has arrived at the mint, it is backing then a certain amount of cash tokens.
Payment to people on same mint is fast. To other mints would require cashu -> lightning (BTC on LN) and then LN transaction to the other mint and conversion (once received) to cashu.
Is this a correct understanding? Cashu is just a usecase of LN that pairs LN-BTC as backing to a new token?
Very nice privacy properties as well. Also possible to do Cashu mint with on chain btc only. Or any other asset really
What about the three line 'pancake' stack symbol?
And I guess the trust assumption would be on the hardware side which is a higher bar to exploit. Regular reboots mitigate zero day exploits.
Maybe nostr:nprofile1qqstnr0dfn4w5grepk7t8sc5qp5jqzwnf3lejf7zs6p44xdhfqd9cgspzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcnv0md0 or nostr:nprofile1qqs9g69ua6m5ec6ukstnmnyewj7a4j0gjjn5hu75f7w23d64gczunmgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qz9thwden5te0v35hgar09ec82c30wfjkcctexf34p3 could add anything
Fair enough. I can't remember the details, but I thought there was some custom sandboxing/isolation
Do you not trust the #GrapheneOS toggle?
Super cool. Do you think Nostr would be better if it was LXMF based?
Are these stop loss alerts? How is the data public?
Is it leaky? Making me want to do another van build
The risk of something going wrong with Coinbase custody is nuts.