Coinjoins are automatic in Wasabi any time you receive a transaction or create change as long as your balance is high enough and fees are low enough. Waiting until you have multiple UTXOs to consolidate instead of coinjoining them one by one saves on fees, this tutorial shows two inputs being consolidated in one coinjoin transaction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbOAbXjzBJg

The coinjoin also consolidates inputs from other peers, so it isn't possible to separate which inputs are owned by each peer. Here's an example of a coinjoin transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/659e7f15dca41fb521915d5e436ad173af776ec414870c41287f4667e19dd98b

Consolidating UTXOs is done when fees are low so that additional block space is not used for transactions when fees are high. You should always use Wasabi Wallet when consolidating UTXOs since it will be done privately in a coinjoin, preventing common ownership from being revealed on chain.

No it's not, and you can verify that for yourself since every line of code is open source: http://github.com/zksnacks/walletwasabi

Wasabi Wallet for on chain transactions. It has coinjoins built in which makes it so no two transactions you send or receive are ever able to be linked to each other.

Coinjoins are handled automatically in Wasabi Wallet, here's a demonstration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbOAbXjzBJg

You can use Wasabi wallet for coinjoins and remix whenever you want since you pay for your own mining fees. You won't have to pay the coordinator any extra fees for remixing though.

Whirlpool creates unmixed change and reveals common input ownership which links your transactions together. Wasabi upgraded to a new coinjoin protocol that allows inputs to be consolidated without revealing they are owned by the same user, and doesn't create unmixable change.

Every time I send a Lightning transaction, I feel a burst of envy from shitcoiners.

Consolidating small UTXOs should be done when transaction fees are low so that your transactions use the least amount of inputs necessary for your payments whenever transaction fees are high.

To preserve your privacy when consolidating, you can prevent revealing multiple UTXOs belong to you by combining them within a WabiSabi coinjoin (available in Wasabi Wallet, Trezor, and BTCPay Server).

Interesting article. How many interpretations would Wasabi Wallet coinjoins with 150-400 inputs have? https://mempool.space/tx/d465033214fd2309dcce5a90c45fcaa788aa4394ee36debe07aad8d8a37907d2

WabiSabi is the cheapest in regards to the amount of privacy you get and block space efficiency: https://mempool.space/tx/9cd9ac87a02c13381fb6dc2a9dfdb1c1e367faf3adcf75aa723d5a5043c6d107

There's even no coordinator fees for inputs that are 1m sats or lower.

This calculator isn't finished yet, but here's a rough idea that compares coordinator fees, value of coins lost from being unmixable, and postmix on chain footprint. "Non-mixable" in Wasabi is an amount added to the mining fee, "Non-mixable" in Whirlpool is leftover change:

I took a couple week break from nostr by accident... I signed out of my client by mistake while traveling to another continent 🫣

Yes. WabiSabi coinjoin privacy cannot be broken even by the state.

Wasabi coinjoins are like taking the bus.

Joinmarket coinjoins are like taking a taxi.

Wasabi Wallet does this for you, there's no advanced setup or coin selection required.

Wasabi uses client side block filters and Tor by default, so the coordinator is not trusted with your xpub address or IP address even when you don't run a full node.

Also, coin control is not trusted to the coordinator either. Coin selection is done by clients, it's just no longer necessary for users to touch manually because WabiSabi coinjoins make your entire balance private without leaving behind leftovers like Whirlpool does.

I wish there was a chart that tracked the total supply of Bitcoin UTXOs that have a negative value if transferred at the median fee rate for that day.

People who rant about up upcoming "Great Reset", "New World Order", or "CBDCs" are destined to lose forever. You *already* live in the nightmare that these terms describe, accepting that grim reality is the first step to actually doing something to fix it.