What are some of the best movies of the past five years?

короче сижу такой никого не трогаю и вдруг захотелось перейти на интерфейс KDE

остановите меня, когда перестану мыть голову

🩵Osaka \••/

🧳

Go out of your way to give people positive feedback.

When someone makes you laugh or learn, tell them.

It's easy to assume they know, but they really might not.

One of my problems with my real-world friends and semi-online friends is that I'm viewed as cold and distant. Kind of on the spectrum, one might say.

I incorrectly assume that since I like their stuff, they must know I like their stuff, which isn't always the case. Instead they're more like, "wtf is Lyn thinking?" In other words, I'm semi-retarded at personal interactions. I'd like more people to know how much I like what they do.

Online or offline, whenever it's comfortable, tell people they're doing good work. Say hi. Tell them thanks. Give gratitude.

Nostr does this better than Twitter, from my experience. Keep it up, lads and lasses.

Бывает, сидим-молчим. И тут кто-то резко встанет и крикнет: "Смотрите-ка, биткоин уже пятьдесят пять тысяч двести двадцать шесть долларов и двадцать два цента стоит!"

Тут ему обязательно кто-то уверено возразит: "Да на РБК говорят, что за биткоин будут давать не больше двадцати двух тысяч ста тридцати четырех долларов и одного цента!"

А потом всегда появляется Майкл Сэйлор полный уверенности в том, что биткоин подорожает еще в тысячу раз.

То есть, одни верят, что цена пойдет вверх, другие — что вниз, но при этом единственную объективную величину, так называемую "рыночную цену" данную нам ощущениях, все как будто игнорируют. Получается, что рыночная цена это такая устойчивая величина, с которой не согласен ни один человек.

Скажем, если бы какой-нибудь огромный фонд публично обязался выкупать все биткоины на отметке в двадцать тысяч долларов, а мы бы тогда получили гарантию, что никогда цена не уйдет ниже, то вряд ли бы мы увидели рыночную цену на этих значениях, потому что на этой отметке цена имеет апсайд, но не имеет даунсайда, рисков столько же, как с бесплатным биткоином. Можно этот мысленный эксперимент развернуть и тогда мы получим потолок цены. А если приложим оба этих условия, можем смело рассчитывать на рыночную цену в заданном диапазоне.

Поскольку рынок открыт для условно бесконечного количества участников, а информация между ними распределена неравномерно, процесс ценообразования для любого из этих участников оказывается трансцендентным (недоступным для восприятия и анализа), но — парадоксально — никакое ценообразование невозможно без попытки со стороны участников рынка его просчитать.

Рыночная цена складывается из прогнозов, поэтому никто и никогда с ней не будет согласен.

#ностр

Supply & demand is just how the price of something is determined in a free market.

There will always be Bitcoin to sell.

There will always be people who will not sell their Bitcoin at any price.

The % of total Bitcoin available to buy decreases each cycle. If you can't understand how this can be true, I don't have the time to explain it to you.

Here’s an observation about shitty Twitter algorithms.

I’ve actually never blocked or muted anyone on Twitter. Never felt the need. 690k followers, countless comments, no filters.

If someone is an ass, I tend to just ignore them or akido them and move on.

I just went over to Twitter and checked my notifications. Some guy posted in an unusually negative way in one of my threads. For a brief moment, I was provoked. But then I looked: he has 8,700 posts and 6 followers. Briefly skimming his profile, it is pure negativity. Imagine this. Like actually take a moment to think about what that process feels like for him, let alone how he impacts others.

Posting eight thousand and seven hundred times, mostly negatively, and after well more than a thousand of those posts, someone elects to follow him.

The algorithm trains us to see this and get angry. When he shows up in our feed, he seems like a normal person who disagrees with us. But he’s not normal. Someone like that is literally and sadly more in the mentally ill camp, even as the algorithm presented him to us like any other normal person, saying we suck.

Imagine if we had more programmable filters and algorithms. Like, mute people with over a thousand posts but with less than one follower per five hundred posts. That filters him out, similarly to how we would visually filter out and thus physically avoid a man holding his own shit in his hand in public on a street, who needs help but not public attention and proximity.

The centralized algorithms we have normalized, are not real life.

We give people virtual access that we would not do publicly, partially because we can program our real-life algorithms with various behavior rules that we can’t do on most virtual platforms.

That’s the thing. All of our normal real-life interactions have algorithms. But in the centralized virtual world, we have little or no programmability for who we allow near us. No heuristics.

Here’s an observation about shitty Twitter algorithms.

I’ve actually never blocked or muted anyone on Twitter. Never felt the need. 690k followers, countless comments, no filters.

If someone is an ass, I tend to just ignore them or akido them and move on.

I just went over to Twitter and checked my notifications. Some guy posted in an unusually negative way in one of my threads. For a brief moment, I was provoked. But then I looked: he has 8,700 posts and 6 followers. Briefly skimming his profile, it is pure negativity. Imagine this. Like actually take a moment to think about what that process feels like for him, let alone how he impacts others.

Posting eight thousand and seven hundred times, mostly negatively, and after well more than a thousand of those posts, someone elects to follow him.

The algorithm trains us to see this and get angry. When he shows up in our feed, he seems like a normal person who disagrees with us. But he’s not normal. Someone like that is literally and sadly more in the mentally ill camp, even as the algorithm presented him to us like any other normal person, saying we suck.

Imagine if we had more programmable filters and algorithms. Like, mute people with over a thousand posts but with less than one follower per five hundred posts. That filters him out, similarly to how we would visually filter out and thus physically avoid a man holding his own shit in his hand in public on a street, who needs help but not public attention and proximity.

The centralized algorithms we have normalized, are not real life.

We give people virtual access that we would not do publicly, partially because we can program our real-life algorithms with various behavior rules that we can’t do on most virtual platforms.

#asknostr

is there any point in doing a p2p buy on Binance , as opposed to a straight card buy? like if Binance could hand over the info any time , really, is there a point ?

haven't started learning about robosats yet , but keen to start my dca in as non-kyc way as possible