How are we betting? Will AI become an instrument of the forces manipulating the market, or will it become an instrument for the free exchange of information (which has its own effect on the market)? How are these outcomes different?
#asknostr
#finance
#nostr
#plebnet
As hate is understood as in the eye of the beholder, careful who is watching.
Yes, that is the spirit. It is on sale now. Surely to return to its intrinsic value.
An old man’s response to Greta Thunberg:
How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my life with your empty words of transcendent truth and beauty beyond my experience, while all you can talk about is submitting to the mandate of anti-scientific authority. How dare you!
For no reason that I can tell, Primal has begun to work as expected for me today, after being unavailable since the recent update. Any explanation would be appreciated.
#primal
Don’t forget us who bought BTC in 2021 for $57,000
It seems to be occurring to many people that the things we are being told are not true. But why should it be different now? My thinking is that the lies benefit the status quo, and acting on different information brings change. I don’t know which is best. That is why it is important to have many actors.
My old man’s response to Greta Thunberg:
How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my life with your empty words of transcendent truth and beauty beyond my experience, while all you can talk about is submitting to the mandate of anti-scientific authority. How dare you!
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
If I act in accordance with my own understanding, is my act free or is it a slave to my understanding?
I am an old man who is not as convinced of conspiracies of emerging complexities as many seem to be. In a Pascal’s wager sort of way, I am making the bet for BitCoin, but only with the understanding that others will be allowed to wager accordingly. The conspiracy is to how to help others understand accordingly.
I don’t calculate odds for those things in which my own efforts are not involved in achieving. I do watch the efforts of others working for impeachment, and I do anticipate some things to watch in that area.
Understanding that change is unintended and unintelligent (and without cause) is a challenge. With regard to testing AI to see if it works, what is your criteria for success? The only criteria I know is whether AI’s response somehow makes sense to me within the grasp of my own thinking. While I believe I will never know whether the theories, theologies and theatrics of my own experience will reveal truth, I am comfortable that it will reveal a course of action that may benefit me. Yet when I look for the courses of action that others recommend, I find too many that are abhorrent to my understanding.
I came to these theories of change through a few of books that I recommend:
- The Square and the Tower: Networks and Power, from the Freemasons to Facebook, by Niall Ferguson
- The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter, by Joseph Henrich
- The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science, by Michael Strevens
They all speak to a process of ‘group think’ that drives emergence, but it doesn’t cause it. Samo Burma was on the DemystifySci Podcast recently also talking of such things:
[https://youtu.be/fy7IIky-cic?si=ujNRjmoyJpEBPOvq]
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
I too believe that information, hype, and language propels collective action. I understand those things to be the theories, theologies and theatrics of our culture. But until there is a course, it becomes difficult for me to determine ‘off-course’.
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
Their biggest act against their own interests seems to me that they have embraced a new type of ‘belief’ system that appears not to make sense to ‘the many’. It forces the many to see them as unreliable authority, to be feared, rather than as the righteous guardians they proclaim to be.
I am more inclined to believe maintaining a stable society, even through policies that might seem counterintuitive, ultimately benefits the many protected from social unrest or revolution. It just seems that those who believe they are maintainers have opted to do so by force rather than sharing a narrative that makes sense to th many. Perhaps it could serve longer-term goals, but goals are the stuff of individuals, not populations.
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin #politics
To my understanding saying it (BITCOIN) persists is to acknowledge that it has so far persisted. I don’t know enough to declare that the eternal has arrived. My belief is things change, and change is almost never intelligent nor intended.
Thank you for your response. Can you share where you get your understanding of such things: DAOs, Circular Economy and the sorts of ‘possible’ alternatives to the status quo. I would like to learn more about them and whether I can make sense of how they really might become threats to the status quo, that is, the complex stability defended by intelligence community, corporate media, academia and big-tech. Those defenders seems to me behaving with acknowledgment that these possibilities are threats.
I also associate some of the changes in my experience to the unintended consequences of the pandemic (actually I associate most change with unintended consequences). Lately I have become very interested in evolutionary science, complex adaptive systems and self ordering systems. Nevertheless, I am also reading Matt Taibbi laments of the activities of the deep-state to suppress the information that might allow for the emergence of novelty. I also read that the intelligence community is already the biggest editor of Wikipedia which creates another wonder as to how process information from that source.
Please share with me the theories that allow you to believe that structures offering alternatives to status quo social organizations emerge. I am inclined to believe this myself, but I also watch the efforts to suppress them.
#asknostr #GrowNostr #PlebChain #Bitcoin
Even with lessons, some people will never learn what they are allowed to do. What can we do with the unteachable?


