Without 'likes' how can we ratio a bad note from a bad actor??? Zaps can't fix this because George Soros could just #Zap a pro-WEF note from Joe Biden to infinity...
π€π€π€
zaplife no longer supports nested scrollbars because nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 hates fun
I don't trust any human who wouldn't allow a dog into their homes π€ͺ
I value Engagement & Conversation over #Zaps
Zaps are just the cherry on top.
If Zaps are hurting my levels of engagement & conversation because people feel they need to 'all or nothing' & associate all information value transfer with money, then I'd rather not receive the Zaps.
2 more days of fiat mining left until 2 glorious weeks of Tennessee, Colorado & 9 straight King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard concerts! Fn JACKED πͺπ
Thx, definitely gonna check it out here in a bit π€
We're gonna open up The Bitcoin Lobby for conversation today at 2pm EST. Come hang π€
nostrnests.com/thebitcoinlobby

Is this more like a YouTube substitute or a Twitter Spaces substitute?
The storyteller makes no choice
soon you will not hear his voice
his job is to shed light
and not to master
Since the end is never told
we pay the teller off in gold
in hopes he will come back
but he cannot be bought or sold
- Robert Hunter
TY my friend π€π«
Felt appropriate considering the hot conversation goin' on right now. π€
We Jammin', Jammin', I wanna Jam it wit you...
If what's preventing you from engaging with my notes is not wanting to part with your sats, save your Zaps. Send a like or even better, a reply. I'd much rather we connect free of charge than not connect at all.
π«π€
Yeah I agree. This idea that value must be tied to some arbitrary monetary amount seems pretty silly. I get value from things that are completely free of charge all day long.
Yeah I agree π― so I'll really never care for the 'all of nothing' approach of Only Zaps. Fortunately I'm an Amethyst user so we've still got the option for both.
Your reach can be valuable to you as well though. Likes are kind of like a read receipt that you were able to connect your message to another user. If you're goal is ultimately to utilize social media to share a message, it's not a terrible thing to get some kind of validation that your message was able to hit in the way you'd hoped it to and that you were able to engage with an audience.
This is just my own personal experience so you can take it for what it's worth, but ever since this concept of 'Only Zaps' came into existence, I feel like my day to day engagement has fallen off a cliff & personally I feel less inspired than I was just a few months ago, to stay as engaged & provide content on #Nostr at the amount that I was engaging early on.
Personally I'm here on social media to help spread a message. Receiving value for my message is secondary to the reach of my message. So all things being equal, absolutely yes I prefer zaps to likes. However if you're telling me the reach of my message is being reduced by 120 people, as is the case that is being presented by Will, I'd surely in this scenario, take the 121 person reach over the measly 21 Sats given out by a single person.
Just my fraction of a cents... π€ͺ
