Avatar
Bada₿it
10b96e9ef0fadec3df121060fa6a8f769c0376ee65f556ca936ff1355579c4c7

I would say that it's morally worse. Being clear on this makes their NFT / "art" excuses void.

3 blocks found in one minute.

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=824x486&blurhash=i86%40K%259t53%7D%24Rz9%7E-YxcI_whSfNY%24jWZI%5BxZavS2D%7CxZ%255Iwfm%24_RiR%25s%2BXSnhnmOFn%7CskR.ohjXI-s%3AslS5oNWEk9avad&x=f4c43569c450f16cf7be59e9ef5c3b63ba261e672f7d10cd7041c61bd6e75bcd

Another day of shitcoin minting on Bitcoin.

GM, defending ordinals = supporting shitcoins.

Ordinals have not been about "art" for many months. They're just shitcoins minted on Bitcoin.

People that consider Etherium a shitcoin scamcasino, should now start looking more closely at what Bitcoin has become.

Satoshi's takes on generic onchain data storage and running extranous use cases on L1. #UnhostedMarcellus

The guy on the left is right.

So much for the "art" use case and Udi's "bringing back the magic into Bitcoin".

They're just minting shitcoins. Same as it ever was.

Would love to see Greenlight included.

A not so hot take by yet another spam apologist.

What if I told you there is no "freedom of transactions" in Bitcoin. The network has always "censored" tx. Why can't I make a100 byte op_return tx? Why can't I make a 5 MB tx? Why am I being "censored"?

Bitcoin clients can alter their config settings and still follow consensus rules. Every node runner can make his/her own choices. There's nothing wrong with that, and that's not censorship.