Having a chat with a friend today, and he was asking me about someone he knows that had a bunch of Bitcoin. This person he knows had passed away and he asked me what would happen to the lost Bitcoin. Of course I gave him the predictable answer of: unless his estate has access to his private keys (or mnemonic) they're gone for good, so I'm a way, everyone else's Bitcoin becomes marginally more valuable.
None of this is surprising to Bitcoiners. What I find interesting though is the disconnect that people have: we were all presumably taught at a very young age that with our allowance money from our folks, or birthday money from family etc, that we should be careful with our it because if we lose it it's gone for good.
Because Bitcoin is digital, the disconnect arises because we've become so conditioned by the banks that our digital money is insured and "safe" with them. The classic example being if our credit or atm card is compromised, we're covered against the fraud loss. We need to get back, as a society, to the mentality of the personal responsibility that comes with self-custody and exercising the caution and planning (eg estate planning) that goes with it.
So honest question, and it's fine if you want to keep it a surprise for now, but it's your intention to speak with regular old plebs in Bitcoin? If so I love the idea.
That is an amazing name. Love it.
"Those who don't learn from history something something."
100%. This is the way the market is supposed to work - don't like a product, don't use it. I wonder hope much they know about Nostr.
This is more than just about energy, that's just the anti-Bitcoin narrative du jour. There are people that have simply decided that they hate #Bitcoin and will jump on whatever narrative that supports they're predetermined hypothesis. Nonetheless, the point remains, these people are doxastically closed and aren't worth your time and energy.
#[0]
Agreed. Government has no place deciding what constitutes a valid use of electricity and what does not, otherwise this once again them deciding winners and losers, which should not be their role.
To continue the dog pile on Elon, I find his branding of NPR, whether you like them or not, as state affiliated media a bit hypocritical. What bothers me is he insinuates that they're a state mouthpiece, but given that his companies have also received corporate welfare (and likely much more than NPR ever has), how are we to know he's also not a state mouthpiece? Anyways, I fixed this for him.

Tl;dr - the cheque they deposited was returned to the mother's estate because the cheque was signed with the wrong kind of pen.
It was just a thought. Of course it's also possibly they don't want to jeopardize any govt bailouts by purchasing Bitcoin directly.
It's possible they have internal bylaws that prevent them from doing so...
Could be worse I suppose, at least it's a reasonably articulate and intelligible bot and doesn't just simply respond things like:
Tweet 1: Why is nobody talking about this? [insert YouTube scammer video]
Tweet 2: This is very good for the community!
Wait, that's not quite right... whatever you get the idea.
