My point exactly 💯 so a right isnt given it must be taken. So privacy can never be a right. You proved my point further.
Oh it will cum alright, but only when i say so.
Go to minibits.cash to download yourself a wallet. Get it installed find your @ adresss located in the contacts tab. Add that to your profile to receive small amounts of bitcoin for your post!
I work for Disney.
I sent an email 3 years ago to our then-CFO pitching Bitcoin on the balance sheet. Not surprisingly, they weren’t interested.
I followed up again last week because we have a new CFO. Here’s the response.
What are your thoughts? nostr:npub1s5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqrs6q7z
“The bitcoin asset class is quite interesting and has been a fast growing asset class for a number of years now. I do think it is an interesting investment alternative for investors that believe the upside justifies the high volatility of the asset.
For corporate purposes, however, I do not think it is an appropriate investment. It is not part of our company strategy (entertainment), and as a store of value for our cash it is too volatile to be useful. I’ve stated my views on CNBC multiple times, and there was a Fortune article on my comments.
Keep in mind, our stock trades on the strength of our brands and other competitive advantages. They provide a level of stability that enables us to maintain a high PE multiple relative to the sector. Investors are not looking for us to be investment speculators - they can buy other trading companies (eg Bunge for commodities) in order to invest in that asset class. If you look at trading company PE multiples, they are generally far below those of TWDC.
Our priority for our cash is safety, liquidity and price stability. We only keep enough cash to ensure the company can function smoothly and efficiently. Beyond that, we return the cash we generate to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
Thanks for thinking about how to make the company better - I appreciate your passion and thoughts.”
I would say that enabling Bitcoin on the balance sheet would necessitate that they would no longer have to require share buybacks in order to bolster their price by allowing them to have liquidity of Bitcoin because Bitcoin is the most liquid asset on the planet they would have access to those dollars in whatever gratuity they needed whenever need but by having it on their balance sheet the buybacks wouldn't need to be a thing anymore as they would end up being necessity a company that would be self-sustaining in the long run.
As he says in his post here they are looking to be self-sustaining longtime company now how do they plan on doing that if they are not looking for a long-term strength and ballot sheet to maintain and sustain themselves
Incorrect, privacy can never be a human right. While being fundamental to freedom, privacy REQUIRES action, creativity, agency, production. All of which CAN NOT be done by a singular individual. The only one that can provide privacy to you is you, yourself. If not by yourself then whom is it that you would require to provide said privacy to you? Do you wish to enslave another human if acquiring said "right" you wish to obtain "worth" it?
Id argue, no.
So ive been trying to game out and think this through myself.
So im thinking it could go something like this
*im retarded so anything i think is literally irrelevant and in no way probably right*
As hash price continues its inevitable trend downward. As it will do so with each halving more miners are going to want more consistent payouts( this model i believe would only be Sustainable in a market where subsidy is larger, as it get smaller this would play out) miners are going to flock to pools that use this scheme. Almost parasitic of sorts (they only care about the payout nothing else) it will centralize mining, but in this way we know cheap power is in no way centralized. So having a centralized pool paying out alot of payments to ever increasing more participants i believe this is going to make it ever more increasing burden on the pool doing so. Think of this scheme AS some sort of UBI. We know these models can never be sustained. As economics has shown us.
Idk what else this could do, do miners try to bleed dry the sugar pool bank rolling everyone? Or is this going to be forever into the one pool to rule them all? Self interest is going to happen but as economics has shown us anytime any type of monopoly has been created the monopoly will use its power negatively in some way that will create the situation to arbitrage the monopoly and benefit in dping so. What is going to be the vector that creates the arbitrage? Im still trying to flesh out the ideas in my head, but with everything thats been going on ive been mulling it over more and more.
But what do i know im an idiot.
I play the FUCK out of some #finalfantasyxiv
Envious. Thank you for sharing this Absolutely stunning once in a lifetime experience. ❤️
These light shows are utterly gorgeous. So mad they aren't low enough for me to see in real life.
block's entire shareholder letter was dedicated to why we're focused on bitcoin, not crypto. the internet needs decentralized digital cash. we will do our part to help make it accessible, make it secure, and make it usable every day.
https://s29.q4cdn.com/628966176/files/doc_financials/2024/q1/Shareholder-Letter_1Q24_Block.pdf
Damn tat, fucking sounds like you're doing yourself a favor
Sounds like you need to better curate your feed. I've had the EXACT opposite of what you claim as my own personal experience
Maybe look into your thyroid levels. Possible that you get cold so easy because of being mismatched.