Re-denominating Bitcoin as sats is a marketing-addled fiat mindset.
Oh, you have to pay 0.0002 BTC for a Frisco Melt at Steak and Shake and your poor little brain can't wrap itself around the coccept of getting hilariously richer by the goddamned minute?
FUCK YOU. THE PRICE OF THINGS SHOULD BE GOING DOWN IN A FUNCTIONING, EFFICIENT ECONOMY. YOU SHOULD BE PISSED ITS NOT 20 SATOSHIS. THATS RIGHT. THAT ZAP YOU GOT FOR RE-NOTING A WARMED UP SPONGEBOB MEME SHOULD BE WORTH A FEISCO MELT. YOURE A FUCKING GENIUS FOR THINKING IN SATS. YOURE CREATING FOMO BY DEFENDING SATS. DONT THINK LIKE MARKETER. MARKETING IS FOR POORS WHO NEED TO BE CONVINCED THINGS ARENT GETTING WORSE WHEN THEY ARE.
Yes, heaven forfend we all get hilariously rich and have to look 4 decimal places past zero to see what a Steak N Shake Frisco Melt costs.
Did you ever see the documentary about the making of Goblin 2?
s̶a̶t̶s̶
̶b̶i̶t̶s̶
teeth
I swear to Almighty God in Heaven, I will use tonal bongs before I adopt bits.
Watching bits advocates lose the argument over and over is almost as fun as watching shit coiners get rekt over and over.
Stop trying to make things make sense for the sake of marketability or whatever. Sometimes unintuitive things are beautiful because they organically sprung out of crazy people who succeeded in making a thing happen.
Lightning is the real Bitcoin Cash and Satoshi's Vision 
"ChatGPT, I would like to tell this philistine to 'learn to code' in a manner that will put the them to sleep before they can even finish reading my reply. "
The reason that Core has to be pro-scammers now is they look like fools if they say they couldn't, despite their reputation as the authoritative, erudite first-line defense of Bitcoin, foresee SegWit/Taproot being exploited. It diminishes the deference they enjoy, and makes their process look like a joke.
Katie Martin (on Bluesky) graciously filled out my activity sheet with the state of her teeth. I don't think people realize Katie's argument about the rarity of her teeth. Cavity-free British teeth are as rare as Blue Akoya pearls. They weren't heretofore known to exist. Cut her a damn break. She's walking around with fort knox in her mouth basically. 
I destroyed my LinkedIn like 5 years ago, and I think I lazy dipshits use LinkedIn as a heuristic to preliminarily verify you aren't a Chinese scammer or something. Because I haven't even been able to get a recruiter to call me, much less an interview from cold call submitting my resume.
I just really hope Coinbase destroyed my records after I closed my account in, like, 2017, like they said they would (after a few years).
Evidently, you're supposed to be able to dictate to your employer the dress code at their workplace.
I don't even know what to say about this image.
Article: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/food/2025/05/15/starbucks-dress-code-protest/83633215007/
Starbucks is just a jobs program for retards at this point.
Yeah I feel like we need some parameters around why gold is "durable".
Firstly, gold is physically soft. Sure, it can't be atomically destroyed, but who wants a puddle of molten gold or gold vapor? Also, you can't back up your gold, and I feel like redundancy should be taken into consideration for durability.
Secondly, keys can be made just as durable as gold and even more, depending what you stamp your keys into. Keys can be backed up, geographically distributed, etc...
I asked Katie Martin to do my homework for me on bluesky and she obliged:
LOL I thought this was Richard Stanley at first
Here is a fun activity sheet just for kids like us! 
Of course she's on Bluesky 
Did anyone that watched that FT piece notice how difficult it was to get the name of the markets desk journalist? It flashed once for a few seconds after a long intro.
"I'm not selling!"
Good. Please never do. I have to retire on this shit, and I can't have you dipping out of this long-range pyramid scheme too early.
I hate it when people do this. It takes 15 seconds tops to verify that the article depicted in a screenshot exists.
must:
