I doubt they're hiding the banksy, they probably want to preserve it. I imagine they'll make some sort of cover for it. The government and council love banksy and his shit art.

amount of coretards, claiming knots does nothing is concerning.

all clear lack of knowledge, ignorance, or just lies, just to stop people from running a better version bitcoin.

they argue with some regular plebs then think that they are some how superior in their coretard mind.

coretards are like grammar police, instead of taking the point, they fix little inconsistencies in the wordings of the people.

just because someone can't use the right technical words while describing something doesn't mean what they are saying is wrong.

Myriad ways. Read Ashton Forbes’ account of what happened to MH-370 or Eric Weinstein’s posts on the gatekeeping of real physics. They basically just classified all the advances.

We’re going to find out advancement in physics did not stop in 1970, it’s just been hidden.

Everyone knows the news is fake, and most people know our medicine is mostly fake, most people here know our economy and monetary system are fake, but we’re about to find out physics (as we know it) is also fake.

Consent of the governed is an oxymoron. People who are governed cannot consent.

Screw your freedoms

Well you can identify money like gold with the senses

I am live in 5 - assuming Murphy has nothing to about it.

What gives the law authority to be applicable toward me?

Why are we early Bitcoiners spending so much time here talking to you about Monero.

Because we know awareness is a weapon and Bitcoiners are the most open to join the fight to bring down the state.

🤡🤡🤡

Chaumian ecash is neither censorship resistant nor peer-to-peer. Those who mislead users lack ethics and integrity.

Knots user.

I'm happy for you that you have tits. 😁

I’m seeing more and more stuff online suggesting John Nash was Satoshi 🤔

What I want to say is that the OP_Return limit is just a mempool policy and not a consensus policy. If a miner wants to mine a transaction with a large OP_Return no one can stop him. So yes, the filter is completely useless and the whole discussion is misleading because transactions with a big OP_Return field are existing today with the policy in place.

Some people want to write data on the blockchain and that’s noting we can stop. If me bring a new policy then these people find a new way to write data in the blockchain. And we will bring up the next policy.

This leads to more and more complexity and in the worst cases the new solutions are much more inefficient than the current one.

I see an extreme danger that we kill bitcoin with policies and a resulting much worse data storing solution.

Bitcoin will never grow more than more than 4MB per 10 Minutes that’s the limit we should focus on

I think that’s a good idea, but the best idea is for her to get jabbed and boosted first, then go to jail

godless faggot

The law isn’t a real thing. It’s a social construct. You cannot prove that laws exist in physical reality. It’s like the concept of countries and states. These things cannot be identified using any of the human senses: sight, touch, taste, smell, hearing.

Don’t say always. You can find ways to avoid these things. Defense is better than revenge. Avoidance is better than defense. Things can and will change for the better imo.