Indeed, nice conversation!
It's great being able to have a peaceful chat from different points of view here in #nostr!
Peace, mate! 🫂
Nice chat, indeed!! 🫂
How can I answer every point made? 😊
Let's see if I can explain my position:
I agree with you that keeping the money out of the State hands would be great.
It will make the government to be more efficient and won't allow it to do whatever they want moving the consequences to the people.
And #bitcoin allow precisely that! 👏
I'm not so worry about the monopoly of violence, though.
Maybe it's because I'm European, but I think an armed society brings more problems that solutions.
Citizen will never be able to resist a State violently. The hope it's on other institutions (justice, free journalism, etc).
Moreover, I think a democratic State doesn't actually relay very often in violence to control its citizens, but it uses other means to do that (press, banks/money, etc).
So I'm not sure that changing the State 'monopoly of violence' is a desired thing for the wellbeing of the people.
I do agree with changing the monopoly of money printing, as I explained.
Have a nice day!!
🫂
When local database in #amethyst ?
😏
Thanks for your work btw! 🫂
Individualism lets many people behind.
I disagree.
States have a function. There's a reason human civilization tends to evolve to a state form.
We can discuss the functions and reach of the State, the organization of different powers, the controls that have to be stablished by the citizens.
Not every State has the same principle (and reach), far from it.
But I have not doubt that some State form is needed to organise the living of a big enough group of humans.
Sorry to disagree here!
🫂😊
Yeah, yeah, of course: relays are a crucial part of #nostr.
A caching layer/database will allow to not ask again and again for the same information to the relays, imo.
That's why I mentioned it.
Thanks again!
🫂
I agree with the decentralised part, but not with the privatise part, sorry! 😊
🫂
Are you talking about religion here?
😉
Thanks for your work!!
Do you think #nostr clients local databases will reduce the burden they lay nowadays over the relays?
At least nostr:npub1fjtdwclt9lspjy8huu3qklr7eklp5uq90u6yh8mec290pqxraccqlufnas and Amethyst (cc. nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z) are working on them, afaict.
Not every responsibility lies on the government, though.
Just push a commit with the following message:
tweak UI UX, ready for nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac
It will be awesome to get your feedbacks one day 🙂
On GitHub https://github.com/jinglescode/nostr-password-manager/tree/v1.0.2
Or wait for 1.0.2 published


I still don't know how do I feel about storing (encrypted) passwords on public relays...
🙄
Nostr Contact List integration in Bitcoin Lightning Wallets adds indeed this identity layer.
i.e.:
Sí, estoy de acuerdo.
El matiz que quería señalar es que muchas veces se acepta algo como parte de una negociación para conseguir lo que se desea.
Y esto no implica bajar la cabeza.
Desde luego hay que ser consciente de las decisiones que se toman, y se tiene que aceptar la responsabilidad de sus efectos.
Indeed.
Protocol simplicity is often undervalued.
🫂
A local database in the client side is indeed a step forward.
It would greatly reduce the actual burden to relays.
BRICS note is never going to be a real thing.
Fiat money is everything about trust, and BRICS countries don't trust each other at that level.
PS: backed partially by gold is an illusion, as it also has to be trusted, as it's not possible to verify it.
I tend to disagree.
Steve loved control, and he wouldn't be able to control #bitcoin .
Sí, pero no.
Aceptar algo no implica bajar la cabeza y aplaudir.
