Depends if you are doing it to learn, or quickly make models.
I'm a fan of reprap. Learn to build a machine, use it to build better machines.
Don't have one. Enjoy it for free!
New (old) machine this morning.
#coffeechain #espresso
https://nostr.build/av/e1b7112e00db4d2c79c98092b1b5fc017356a56a6d0b00a4c342c58c80a0d882.mp4
"The football world watched in awe"?
You must be thinking of the arsenal defence and their hundred million DM, as Taiwo and Anthony tore past them.
I felt sorry for them. They had to have a sit down, and try to work out what had just happened to them.
They've got no chance in Europe, at least not unless it's got a lot easier since we last won the big cup.
Youuuuu reeeedddds!
Rhythm is a dancer, Anthony Elanga.
Taiwo, Taiwo, Taiwo....
There's plenty of that. I would argue it's the root of the problem, not the solution.
I always think that people should be on the receiving end of what they propose, to understand the value of tolerance and support from others.
It seems harsh to wish fascism on you, but I won't lose any sleep over it, given that you started it.
I assume that you are not giving every word the importance that it deserves, because you are too busy frothing at the mouth to discuss it rationally, or don't really care.
It's harder to get guns in Japan. In Japan fewer children are killed with guns in school per capita.
That's the crucial impact of 'easier'.
Absolutism and false equivalence shows an unwillingness to engage honestly and find common ground. Which at least goes some way to explaining why you don't want to contribute to making a fair and free society.
If you can't scrutinise and hold your reoresentatives to the values mandated democratically by your society, there is no chance that you are going to constrain armed individuals to reasonable social behavior.
It would seem to me that you should work on that, not the rights of the criminal or unstable to easy access to guns in order to exercise their whim to kill people.
I suppose that we are all different though.
What's your superior plan?
Those who are anti-social. Those undermining the collective ability of a society to it's own self determination, and setting it's values, freedoms, and providing of services and infrastructure to make it stronger and provide greater opportunity to it's members.
Nobody is saying no guns. I am saying reasonable gun controls so that nutters can't kill a lot of people easily.
Having a gun wont fix that, but you might be a bit less worried about your kids at school.
This is where tolerance, and a desire to actually form social groups for everyones benefit, comes in.
Those who other groups like immigrants (we basically all are immigrants), are intentionally destroying our society so that we are too divided to stop them taking advantage of us.
A gun won't fix that. We are going to have to help each other to be smarter, and respond collectively.
Well I strongly suggest that we try harder to make it work. Because you are not going to be able to kill everyone that comes to take your stuff.
If that doesn't work, try harder still.
That's exactly why we do it together. Help each other. The one thing we can all absolutely guarantee is that we are wrong about something. Of course we don't think so. It's why we believe what we believe.
That's why society is so valuable. Power of juggernaught numbers, coupled with consensus judgement to reduce mistakes.
Don't give up on it, try to do it better.
#EPL #football #soccer
Only two EFL games took less than 100 minutes this weekend.
If the players and officials are going to piss about so much, they should give up their half-time and just change ends and keep going. Fans have transport connections to make, and dinner engagements to keep. Selfish twats.
I wouldn't mind...but it's not like they even play 90 minutes as it is. The players keep sitting down, and the ref keeps chatting to their mates in the cupboard, and watching the telly.
The lot of them need a rocket up their arse.
It's possible. But it requires the people to lose vigilance, to not care, and to fail to act fairly and tolerantly with a cohesive social commitment to each other.
History is littered with the many asserting their values over the few. The trick is not to let them divide us with self interest. Of course those who do not have your best interests at heart, will spend a lot of money and effort to persuade you that they are the only choice, and that 'they' are all the same.
They are not, and if they are change them.
You think that's slippery..... try to get a capitalist to explain when to let the market decide. :-)
Don't know what I'm doing. Only just joined nostr, for the socials. :-)
No. But I believe that if they don't it's my, your, our fault, and we should exercise out democratic power and responsibility to fix it.