Avatar
Machu Pikacchu
1e908fbc1d131c17a87f32069f53f64f45c75f91a2f6d43f8aa6410974da5562
Interested in bitcoin and physics and their intersection. https://github.com/machuPikacchuBTC/bitcoin

ā€œBut we need inflation or else the economy dies!!ā€

Assume everyone’s income and savings keeps pace with inflation. Then there’s no reason to have inflation… It only works if on average it takes purchasing power away from the majority of people.

If humans are still using Bitcoin after becoming multiplanetary then it’s likely mining infrastructure moves closer to the sun for abundant cheap energy. It would be an arms race to see who could capture more sunlight to power their rigs.

You might expect to see mining equipment in a tighter orbit around the sun so those machines have less latency between each other as well. This also lowers average latency for on chain transactions since planets are often on opposing sides of the sun so a lot of communication has to pass by there anyway.

The Samurai wallet indictment alleges the Samurai service is a money transmitter despite not meeting the definitions set forth by FinCEN. The service itself never took control of funds nor did it transmit the funds. If this case rules in favor of the DoJ then it sets a precedent that could be used to target mining in the US.

A miner takes transactions and includes them in a block and then broadcasts them out to the network. This process is not meaningfully different from what Samurai was doing if we go by the extremely loose definition of money transmitter the DoJ is proposing.

This means that all miners could eventually be forced to apply for a money transmitter license which can be denied or revoked on political grounds. It also drastically raises the barrier of entry and so pushes the industry into the hands of those companies and individuals who are politically connected or who can afford the lawyers to help them acquire the license.

Reminder that this is coming at a time where Antpool has almost 50% of the hashrate. If mining is jeopardized in the US then expect Antpool to have well over 50%. Now is the time to raise awareness and share your concerns with policymakers.

It would be great if it couldn’t even get to the inbox unless there’s a stamp.

Thanks for building this app!

Not sure it counts as a single page template but this engineer used traceroute to distribute his resume. That sells the candidate far better than any well formatted pdf in my opinion.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32609588

Does the samurai case open the door for requiring miners apply for money transmitting licenses šŸ¤”

This effectively kills pleb mining in the US

I've had a bit more thinking on Russia and NATO powers. Clearly I'm just a hobbyist, not a military strategist, so I'm slow on the uptake on these things. But when I finally realize something or change my thinking (whether it is correct or not) I like to post it on nostr.

First, a quote from the book "Prisoners of Geography" by Tim Marshall: "Vladimir Putin says he is a religous man, a great supporter or the Russian Orthodox Church. If so, he may well go to bed each night, say his prayers and ask God: "Why didn't you put some mountains in Ukraine?" If God had built mountains in Ukraine, then the great expanse of flatland that is the North European Plain would not be such encouraging territory from which to attack Russia repeatedly. As it is, Putin has no choice: he must at least attempt to control the flatlands to the west. So it is with all nations, big or small. The landscape imprisons their leaders, giving them fewer choices and less room to manoeuvre than you might think."

Second, Barack Obama said that because Ukraine is a core Russian interest, but not a core American interest (America would not be defeated via Ukraine), then Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there. "The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-nato country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do. There are ways to deter, but it requires you to be very clear ahead of time about what is worth going to war for and what is not. Now, if there is somebody in this town that would claim that we would consider going to war with Russia over Crimea and eastern Ukraine, they should speak up and be very clear about it. The idea that talking tough or engaging in some military action that is tangential to that particular area is somehow going to influence the decision making of Russia or China is contrary to all the evidence we have seen over the last 50 years."

To be clear, America is not at war with Russia. It is supplying Ukraine, but the US remains out of the war. But what Barack was saying is that Russia will escalate because Ukraine matters more to them than to us.

If you assume American military leadership is logical and reasonable (which I think Putin does) then they would never have stepped in to back Ukraine in the first place unless they planned to "go all the way". And this is why Putin takes every Western threat of escalation very seriously. This is why he is now reading his troops to be trained on tactical nukes. If he didn't, he would be derelict in his duties to defend Russia from a threat that must be (logically reasoning thing out) intent on toppling Russia.

So I think America intended to topple Russia, and believed Navalny was one strategy, bombing the Nord Stream was another, sanctions was another, confiscating central bank assets was another, getting the world to back the West by luring Russia to strike first was another, and supplying Ukraine with superior weapons systems was yet another, and with all of that combined with their various covert CIA activities, surely they had a very good chance. But alas, those strategies all failed. And then China decided to backstop Russia.

Ukraine now has long-range ATACMS and successfully strikes military assets far into Russian occupied Ukraine including Crimea, including military bases, military training (over 100 dead nearly instantly) and a civilian oil refinery. This won't turn the tide of the war, but it has caused the war to escalate, as Russia now sends in far more drones seeking artillery, abrams tanks (they just got another) and those ATACMS systems.

As troops in Ukraine are running low, and the West is not ready to concede, they are threatening moving forces in. Russia's response was to train for the usage of tactical nukes. I don't think he is bluffing. I think NATO forces present a very credible threat of an attempt to collapse Russia, and Russia cannot win against NATO forces without resorting to tactical nukes.

So I think the Western forces backing Ukraine (NATO, France, US, UK) at some point will stop talking tough and concede. Because most of their plans already failed. I think there is a limit to how much war they are willing to get involved in... they want a lot, but not quite nukes.

This is a great theory. It does a great job explaining Russia’s motivation and their point of view. It discounts the US point of view though.

Do you remember the solar winds hack? Remember all the critical infrastructure that Russia has been probing and even the gas pipeline they hit with ransomware? They invested a lot of resources into their troll factories to sway public opinion in the west to whatever suits their needs. They are clearly hostile to the West and at some point a hot war was inevitable.

Their whole foundation makes no sense. ā€œThe beurgeoisie have too much influence on society. Let’s replace them with a group called the State instead and codify their superiority in law. That will fix it!ā€

nostr:note1egwresn6lngsgy2d2pwnhxe8k25x8fx9zyvqrm2qgrm5398zs93ssx0wda

Complete privacy is neigh impossible. You can't achieve it in the domain of computers and the Internet and mobile phones.

The US intelligence agencies know the top secrets of Russia and China and North Korea. Russia knows the top secrets of Israel and the US. If intelligence agencies cannot protect their own top secrets using the best technologies available, what chance do you have to protect your anonymity online? Maybe you can protect your bitcoin seeds offline using seedsigner or cold card because they are offline, but beyond that you are more exposed than you think you are. Do you use Starlink? Do you think that access point (even if bypassed) isn't slurping up your physical position as you walk around the house? I bet it can see the wrinkles in your ballsack. You think they can't listen to you via electrical power lines in your house? Do you think satellite images are only as good as seen on Google Earth? Do you think computer chips don't have backdoor circuits? Why do you think the US cares so much about Taiwan and China? It's not because of the wellbeing of Taiwanese people I guarantee you that. Why do you think they banned TikTok and Huawei? I was approached by government agents in the late 1990s seeking to "slurp" all the data from Sun Microsystems, and we laughed at the notion (the bandwidth was not available, it was nuts). Yes, we fought down the clipper chip and felt like we had won... but a few years later I heard about ECHELON and was appalled to find out this had started way back in 1971. They've had their fingers deep in this pie for a long time. My work in computer security did nothing more than to convince me that computers cannot be secured. We lost a long time ago.

The only thing that protects most people is the fact that there are 8 billion of us, and those who would come after some people have to pick and choose who to come after. Like pack animals, you can blend into the pack and not get picked off by the wolves. But it's not because you are invisible.

Little chance Russia is banning it. Their government will make it so they have a monopoly on mining within their borders. They’ll tightly control on and off ramps. They’ll set up their own lightning networks to control cross-border flows. Their oligarchs understand its utility and won’t give it up. It’s still early in this game.

If Antpool does indeed control the block template for more than half the hashrate then they become a natural ally for the legacy system that wants to control payments.

Expect more developments there. The ECB and the US Fed would prefer maintaining some level of control over having none at all and will inevitably partner with any pool in that position.

In cybersecurity there’s the ā€œzero trustā€ model. I wonder if collateralizing all network requests with eCash can be part of the model too?